Got an Optimum Letter About Strike 3 Holdings?
A Strike 3 Holdings Optimum letter is usually a notice that a federal court has allowed Strike 3 Holdings to subpoena the name and address linked to an IP address on your account. It is a serious document. It is not a judgment, it is not a criminal charge, and it does not mean you have been named in the lawsuit. Most of these cases begin against a “John Doe” known only by an IP address.
This page explains what Optimum itself says publicly about civil subpoenas, what a Strike 3 Holdings Optimum letter usually contains, and what to do next. If you want a fast answer about your own letter, call or tap (312) 201-8310 for a free, confidential consultation.
What Optimum says about civil subpoenas
Optimum publishes a Legal Compliance page. It says legal process in a civil matter that requires production of Optimum subscriber records should be issued to CSC Holdings, LLC, and that:
“civil litigants seeking third party subscriber records must obtain a court order pursuant to law, with sufficient time allocated to allow the subscriber notice and opportunity to appear and object to the release of such information.”
In plain terms: according to Optimum’s own published policy, a civil litigant like Strike 3 Holdings needs a court order, and that order should leave time for you to receive notice and object before your records are released. Optimum does not publish a fixed number of days on that page. Your Strike 3 Holdings Optimum letter and the court order in your case set the dates.
Please note that your letter may be from Yaana Technologies LLC on behalf of CSC Holdings, LLC
ISP policies change, and the court order in your own case controls. Use the dates printed on your own Strike 3 Holdings Optimum letter, not dates from this page or from someone else’s letter.
What a Strike 3 Holdings Optimum letter usually includes
- A federal case number and the court (for example, a docket that looks like 2:26-cv-01795)
- An IP address and a date and time
- Dates related to when the provider says it will respond, or dates set by the court
- Sometimes a copy of the court order or the subpoena
Keep the provider name exact. Your documents should refer to Optimum (the company’s legal process page directs civil subpoenas to CSC Holdings, LLC). Each provider’s notice looks different. Other provider pages: Spectrum subpoena notice, Comcast Xfinity Letter, Verizon Letter, AT&T Internet Letter, Cox Letter, Frontier Letter.
What the letter is not
- A Strike 3 Holdings Optimum letter is not proof that the account holder downloaded anything. The person who pays the bill may be a family member, roommate, guest, or someone else using the connection.
- It is not a settlement demand by itself, and it is not a criminal charge.
- It does not mean Strike 3 Holdings already has your name. The provider’s response to the subpoena is how the plaintiff asks for that information.
What to do next
- ☐ Read every page calmly, including any court order or subpoena enclosed with it.
- ☐ Keep every document as it is. Do not delete files, wipe devices, or uninstall software.
- ☐ Do not contact Strike 3 Holdings or its attorneys yourself. What you say can affect your privacy and your options.
- ☐ Do not file anything in court on your own without advice. A filing you make yourself can put your name in the public court record.
- ☐ Get a free, confidential consultation. Call (312) 201-8310, or email or upload your Optimum letter through our contact page.
For a fuller checklist, see the Strike 3 Holdings ISP letter guide and our Strike 3 Holdings FAQ.
Your options, in plain terms
- A quiet, anonymous resolution. Many people prefer to resolve the matter confidentially through counsel, often without their name appearing in the public court record.
- Challenge the subpoena. Depending on the facts and the court, an attorney may file a motion to quash or ask the court to let you proceed anonymously.
- Defend the case in court. If the facts support it, Antonelli Law® defends Strike 3 Holdings cases in federal court.
Most people who contact us want a quiet, anonymous resolution. We also defend in court when that is the right path. See pros and cons of settling and why filing your own motion can affect your privacy.
Attorney Highlight: Alec Dardis
Alec Dardis is an Associate at Antonelli Law®. Born and raised in Southern California (Orange County area), he was a competitive junior tennis player and captain of the Men’s Division 1 tennis team at Colgate University, where he earned a Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy. He later received the Dean’s Scholarship to DePaul University College of Law, earned a CALI Award in Negotiations, made Dean’s List, and graduated with a Juris Doctor and a Certificate in Intellectual Property. He is licensed in Illinois and handles federal copyright matters nationwide.
In the firm’s BitTorrent practice, Alec has personally assisted hundreds of clients with cases involving copyright holders, including Strike 3 Holdings. He handles the consultation, the reading of the letter, settlement talks when that is what the client wants, and court defense when that is the better path.
Phone: (312) 201-8310. Email: adardis@antonelli-law.com.
Clients Appreciate Our Communication & Results
Here is just one client review of Alec Dardis. Click the link below for many others.
Posted by anonymous | September 30, 2026 | Hired Attorney
Highly Recommend Alec Van Dardis
“We had a consultation with Alec and he explained our options in detail. He made us feel comfortable and gave us time to ask a lot of questions. At the end of the consultation we made another appointment so we could decide which option to take. We felt that we were in good hands starting with consultation. Alec was thorough in explaining every step, what we needed to do and the timing. He was a great communicator, always followed up and very professional. We are very grateful for all Alec did to get this case closed. We would highly recommend Alec to others that need his expertise.”
Got a Optimum letter about Strike 3 Holdings?
Most people we talk with want a quiet, anonymous resolution. We also defend cases in court when that is the better path. The first step is simply a free, confidential consultation about your document.
Call or tap: (312) 201-8310
Or email or upload your documents through our contact page, or choose an attorney and book a time below.
Schedule Your Free Confidential Strike 3 Holdings Consultation
Speak directly with our team. Choose the attorney you prefer. A consultation is not a decision to go to court.
Alec Dardis
Paul Sanders
Melissa Ross
Jeffrey Antonelli
Frequently asked questions
Who is CSC Holdings, LLC?
Optimum’s Legal Compliance page says legal process in civil matters for Optimum subscriber records should be issued to CSC Holdings, LLC. You may see that name in court documents.
Do I get a chance to object?
Optimum says the court order must allow sufficient time for subscriber notice and an opportunity to appear and object. Talk with an attorney before filing anything, because a filing can put your name in the public record.
How many days do I have after a Strike 3 Holdings Optimum letter?
Optimum does not list a fixed number on its policy page. Use the dates on your Strike 3 Holdings Optimum letter and in the court order.
Can I get help if I live outside Illinois?
Yes. Antonelli Law® handles Strike 3 Holdings matters in federal courts nationwide. You can email or upload your documents, or call (312) 201-8310.
Related reading
- Strike 3 Holdings Spectrum subpoena notice
- Strike 3 Holdings ISP letter guide
- ISP subpoena orders: deadlines depend on the court
- Strike 3 Holdings FAQ
- Should I ignore a Strike 3 Holdings subpoena?
This page is general information about Strike 3 Holdings and similar BitTorrent copyright cases. It is not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every case is different. Client reviews describe individual experiences. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Antonelli Law® defends people and businesses against copyright claims and does not represent copyright holders. Attorney advertising. Information is current as of October 23, 2026.
TORRENT DEFENDERS® is a federally registered trademark owned exclusively by the Law Offices of Jeffrey J. Antonelli, Ltd. dba Antonelli Law®.
Fathers and Daughters Nevada LLC Moves to Name and Serve in Texas
Strike 3 Holdings Minnesota
The Details About New Jersey Strike 3 Holdings Lawsuits
About Author
JAntonelli
Jeffrey Antonelli is a member of the federal trial bar of the Northern District of Illinois and is admitted to numerous federal courts around the country. He has been a civil litigator nearly 25 years in a broad range of actions representing corporations and individuals as plaintiffs and defendants in state and federal court. Jeffrey has been interviewed by the media many times, including Bloomberg BNA, NBC, The New York Times, Chicago Lawyer, Chicago Tribune, and the longstanding lawyer’s publication Chicago Daily Law Bulletin. Prior to forming Antonelli Law Ltd. in 2007 Jeffrey worked for several litigation boutiques in Chicago’s Loop as well as a full service firm. His litigation experience includes hotly contested issues in intellectual property, business, insurance, and consumer fraud. He is an adviser to the Illinois Board of Higher Education Advisory Council for Private Business and Vocational Schools (PBVS), and was a member of the Illinois State Bar Association Education Law Section Council from 2012-2013. Jeffrey is especially proud of his work representing hundreds of students defrauded by improperly accredited educational institutions, including as certified class counsel. Before attending law school, Jeffrey was interested first in business, and then in biomedical ethics. These interests led him to graduate from the nation’s largest philosophy department at Loyola University in Chicago, where some of his favorite (and most challenging) subjects were cognitive science and philosophy of science. During college he held positions at the University of Chicago’s Ben May Institute; as a medical assistant for a University of Chicago foot and ankle surgeon; and volunteered in the emergency room at the University of Chicago Hospitals. These experiences led to studying health law at the DePaul College of Law where Jeffrey earned his law degree and a certificate in health law. At that time DePaul’s Institute for Health Law was consistently ranked in the top 10 health law specialty programs nationwide. During law school Jeffrey immersed himself in studying the practical and public policy aspects of health care through internships at the American Medical Association in Chicago, and on Capitol Hill at the Governmental Relations Office of the Association of American Medical Colleges in Washington, DC. Jeffrey has concentrated in civil litigation throughout his legal career, and is a member of the federal trial bar of the Northern District of Illinois, the Central District of Illinois federal court, and all federal courts of Colorado, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Indiana. In addition, he is a member of the DuPage County Bar Association and the Illinois State Bar Association. Jeffrey prides himself on his strong personal ideals, passionate, ethical advocacy, and working hard to bring the best possible results for his clients. He also maintains a special interest in cases involving fraud. Whether due to good parenting, his family’s law enforcement employment, undergraduate studies in philosophy including ethics, or a fortuitous outcome of good breeding, one essence of Jeffrey’s character is a drive to root out the truth behind fraudulent practices.