Got a Verizon Letter About Strike 3 Holdings?
A Strike 3 Holdings Verizon letter is usually a notice that a federal court has allowed Strike 3 Holdings to subpoena the name and address linked to an IP address on your account. It is a serious document. It is not a judgment, it is not a criminal charge, and it does not mean you have been named in the lawsuit. Most of these cases begin against a “John Doe” known only by an IP address.
This page explains what Verizon itself says publicly about civil subpoenas, what a Strike 3 Holdings Verizon letter usually contains, and what to do next. If you want a fast answer about your own letter, call or tap (312) 201-8310 for a free, confidential consultation.
What Verizon says about civil subpoenas
Verizon publishes a transparency report that answers the question “Does Verizon also receive requests for data in civil cases?” Its answer is yes. Verizon says demands in civil cases make up a small percentage of the demands it receives, and that it “carefully reviews each demand received to ensure compliance with applicable legal requirements.”
An earlier Verizon transparency report explains that civil subpoenas are generally issued under Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that Verizon reviews each civil request for validity, and that the most common reason it produced no records was that the records no longer existed under its retention periods.
Verizon’s transparency page also notes that its reported figures now include Frontier. If your letter came from Frontier, see our Frontier letter page.
Verizon does not publish a fixed notice period for subscribers in Strike 3 Holdings cases that we could verify. The timing in your case comes from the court order and the dates printed on your Strike 3 Holdings Verizon letter.
ISP policies change, and the court order in your own case controls. Use the dates printed on your own Strike 3 Holdings Verizon letter, not dates from this page or from someone else’s letter.
What a Strike 3 Holdings Verizon letter usually includes
- A federal case number and the court (for example, a docket that looks like 2:26-cv-01795)
- An IP address and a date and time
- Dates related to when the provider says it will respond, or dates set by the court
- Sometimes a copy of the court order or the subpoena
Keep the provider name exact. Your documents should refer to the exact Verizon service named in your documents, for example Verizon Fios, Verizon Internet Services, or Verizon 5G Home. These are different services, so write down the one that appears on your letter. Each provider’s notice looks different. Other provider pages: Spectrum subpoena notice, Comcast Xfinity Letter, AT&T Internet Letter, Cox Letter, Optimum Letter, Frontier Letter.
What the letter is not
- A Strike 3 Holdings Verizon letter is not proof that the account holder downloaded anything. The person who pays the bill may be a family member, roommate, guest, or someone else using the connection.
- It is not a settlement demand by itself, and it is not a criminal charge.
- It does not mean Strike 3 Holdings already has your name. The provider’s response to the subpoena is how the plaintiff asks for that information.
What to do next
- ☐ Read every page calmly, including any court order or subpoena enclosed with it.
- ☐ Keep every document as it is. Do not delete files, wipe devices, or uninstall software.
- ☐ Do not contact Strike 3 Holdings or its attorneys yourself. What you say can affect your privacy and your options.
- ☐ Do not file anything in court on your own without advice. A filing you make yourself can put your name in the public court record.
- ☐ Get a free, confidential consultation. Call (312) 201-8310, or email or upload your Verizon letter through our contact page.
For a fuller checklist, see the Strike 3 Holdings ISP letter guide and our Strike 3 Holdings FAQ.
Your options, in plain terms
- A quiet, anonymous resolution. Many people prefer to resolve the matter confidentially through counsel, often without their name appearing in the public court record.
- Challenge the subpoena. Depending on the facts and the court, an attorney may file a motion to quash or ask the court to let you proceed anonymously.
- Defend the case in court. If the facts support it, Antonelli Law® defends Strike 3 Holdings cases in federal court.
Most people who contact us want a quiet, anonymous resolution. We also defend in court when that is the right path. See pros and cons of settling and why filing your own motion can affect your privacy.
Attorney Highlight: Paul Sanders
Paul Sanders, an Associate at Antonelli Law®, defends people in BitTorrent copyright cases and in satellite and cable piracy matters. His work includes depositions, arbitrations, and cases in both state and federal court. He also mediated more than two dozen cases through the Circuit Court of Cook County Mediation Program.
Paul graduated with honors from the John Marshall Law School, earning both his law degree and a certificate in intellectual property. While there, he was Lead Articles Editor of the school’s intellectual property law review and taught oral argument to first- and second-year students. He is licensed in Illinois and admitted to the General Bar of the Northern District of Illinois. He handles the BitTorrent consultation from start to finish: he reads the ISP letter with you, then either pursues a quiet settlement or helps defend the case in court, whichever fits.
Phone: (312) 201-8310. Email: paul@antonelli-law.com.
Clients Appreciate Our Communication & Results
Here is just one client review of Paul Sanders. Click the link below for many others.
Posted by anonymous | October 14, 2025 | Hired Attorney
Great Attorney
“This experience was one of the most stressful experiences I have ever dealt with. Mostly because it came out of no where and I have never been in trouble with the law like this before. From the beginning, Mr. Sanders was so nice and calming. I know he stayed on the phone with longer than he had to just to make sure I was ok. Although I remained stressed, he put me at ease with his knowledge, confidence, and sincerity. The entire process took about 2 1/2 weeks and I was so grateful when it was over. He is a great attorney.”
Got a Verizon letter about Strike 3 Holdings?
Most people we talk with want a quiet, anonymous resolution. We also defend cases in court when that is the better path. The first step is simply a free, confidential consultation about your document.
Call or tap: (312) 201-8310
Or email or upload your documents through our contact page, or choose an attorney and book a time below.
Schedule Your Free Confidential Strike 3 Holdings Consultation
Speak directly with our team. Choose the attorney you prefer. A consultation is not a decision to go to court.
Alec Dardis
Paul Sanders
Melissa Ross
Jeffrey Antonelli
Frequently asked questions
My letter says Verizon Fios. Is that different from Verizon 5G Home?
Yes. Verizon Fios, Verizon Internet Services, and Verizon 5G Home are different services. Use the exact name printed on your letter or listed in the court documents, because it helps confirm which account and IP address are involved.
Does Verizon check the subpoena before responding?
Verizon says it carefully reviews each demand it receives to make sure it complies with applicable legal requirements. That review is not a defense for you; it is the provider’s own process.
How long until Verizon responds?
We could not verify a fixed Verizon timeline for these cases. Use the dates on your own Strike 3 Holdings Verizon letter and the court order in your case.
Can I get help if I live outside Illinois?
Yes. Antonelli Law® handles Strike 3 Holdings matters in federal courts nationwide. You can email or upload your documents, or call (312) 201-8310.
Choose better, choose smarter, choose Antonelli Law®.
Related reading
- Strike 3 Holdings Spectrum subpoena notice
- Strike 3 Holdings ISP letter guide
- ISP subpoena orders: deadlines depend on the court
- Strike 3 Holdings FAQ
- Should I ignore a Strike 3 Holdings subpoena?
This page is general information about Strike 3 Holdings and similar BitTorrent copyright cases. It is not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every case is different. Client reviews describe individual experiences. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Antonelli Law® defends people and businesses against copyright claims and does not represent copyright holders. Attorney advertising. Information is current as of October 23, 2026.
TORRENT DEFENDERS® is a federally registered trademark owned exclusively by the Law Offices of Jeffrey J. Antonelli, Ltd. dba Antonelli Law®.
September Productions Inc Subpoenas Texas Comcast Subscribers
MALIBU MEDIA LLC Files Another 4 New Lawsuits in MICHIGAN – ISP Subpoena Defense
Strike 3 Holdings Wisconsin Filings: 7 New Cases (Sept. 30, 2026)
About Author
JAntonelli
Jeffrey Antonelli is a member of the federal trial bar of the Northern District of Illinois and is admitted to numerous federal courts around the country. He has been a civil litigator nearly 25 years in a broad range of actions representing corporations and individuals as plaintiffs and defendants in state and federal court. Jeffrey has been interviewed by the media many times, including Bloomberg BNA, NBC, The New York Times, Chicago Lawyer, Chicago Tribune, and the longstanding lawyer’s publication Chicago Daily Law Bulletin. Prior to forming Antonelli Law Ltd. in 2007 Jeffrey worked for several litigation boutiques in Chicago’s Loop as well as a full service firm. His litigation experience includes hotly contested issues in intellectual property, business, insurance, and consumer fraud. He is an adviser to the Illinois Board of Higher Education Advisory Council for Private Business and Vocational Schools (PBVS), and was a member of the Illinois State Bar Association Education Law Section Council from 2012-2013. Jeffrey is especially proud of his work representing hundreds of students defrauded by improperly accredited educational institutions, including as certified class counsel. Before attending law school, Jeffrey was interested first in business, and then in biomedical ethics. These interests led him to graduate from the nation’s largest philosophy department at Loyola University in Chicago, where some of his favorite (and most challenging) subjects were cognitive science and philosophy of science. During college he held positions at the University of Chicago’s Ben May Institute; as a medical assistant for a University of Chicago foot and ankle surgeon; and volunteered in the emergency room at the University of Chicago Hospitals. These experiences led to studying health law at the DePaul College of Law where Jeffrey earned his law degree and a certificate in health law. At that time DePaul’s Institute for Health Law was consistently ranked in the top 10 health law specialty programs nationwide. During law school Jeffrey immersed himself in studying the practical and public policy aspects of health care through internships at the American Medical Association in Chicago, and on Capitol Hill at the Governmental Relations Office of the Association of American Medical Colleges in Washington, DC. Jeffrey has concentrated in civil litigation throughout his legal career, and is a member of the federal trial bar of the Northern District of Illinois, the Central District of Illinois federal court, and all federal courts of Colorado, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Indiana. In addition, he is a member of the DuPage County Bar Association and the Illinois State Bar Association. Jeffrey prides himself on his strong personal ideals, passionate, ethical advocacy, and working hard to bring the best possible results for his clients. He also maintains a special interest in cases involving fraud. Whether due to good parenting, his family’s law enforcement employment, undergraduate studies in philosophy including ethics, or a fortuitous outcome of good breeding, one essence of Jeffrey’s character is a drive to root out the truth behind fraudulent practices.