Strike 3 Holdings New York: 12 New Cases (Free Guide)

Share

Strike 3 Holdings New York filings moved to the Southern District on November 2, 2026, when Strike 3 Holdings filed 12 new John Doe copyright cases in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Each case names one internet subscriber identified only by an IP address. Below you will find every case, the Exhibit A details, the assigned judges where court records show one, where each case stands as of November 3, 2026, and what usually comes next. If your internet provider sends you a letter about one of these cases, call or tap (312) 201-8310 for a free, confidential consultation.

Strike 3 Holdings New York filings: 12 cases filed November 2, 2026

All 12 cases were filed the same day. The first digit of each docket number is the courthouse location: “1:” is Manhattan (8 cases) and “7:” is White Plains (4 cases).

The table lists details from each case’s Exhibit A, the document attached to the complaint that lists the IP address, the approximate location, the internet provider, and the works Strike 3 Holdings says were shared. Links in the Docket column open the Exhibit A and, where available, the complaint for each case. In these cases the caption reads only Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, so the IP address comes from the Exhibit A.

Filed Docket IP address City ISP Works listed
11/02/2026 1:26-cv-09568
Exhibit A · Complaint
173.56.227.220 New York, NY Verizon Fios 27
11/02/2026 1:26-cv-09571
Exhibit A · Complaint
141.155.129.219 New York, NY Verizon Fios 25
11/02/2026 1:26-cv-09574
Exhibit A · Complaint
71.105.213.161 New York, NY Verizon Fios 24
11/02/2026 1:26-cv-09576
Exhibit A · Complaint
74.71.174.110 New York, NY Spectrum 33
11/02/2026 1:26-cv-09578
Exhibit A · Complaint
100.12.236.212 New York, NY Verizon Fios 32
11/02/2026 1:26-cv-09579
Exhibit A · Complaint
100.37.203.67 New York, NY Verizon Fios 29
11/02/2026 1:26-cv-09580
Exhibit A · Complaint
69.203.20.40 New York, NY Spectrum 27
11/02/2026 1:26-cv-09582
Exhibit A · Complaint
96.232.164.123 New York, NY Verizon Fios 48
11/02/2026 7:26-cv-09585
Exhibit A · Complaint
67.86.99.193 New Rochelle, NY Optimum Online 24
11/02/2026 7:26-cv-09589
Exhibit A · Complaint
96.232.186.40 Mount Vernon, NY Verizon Fios 30
11/02/2026 7:26-cv-09590
Exhibit A · Complaint
24.188.136.148 Stormville, NY Optimum Online 55
11/02/2026 7:26-cv-09591
Exhibit A · Complaint
24.187.170.55 White Plains, NY Optimum Online 49

Source: court records for each case, including the complaint and Exhibit A, as of November 3, 2026. The city and provider come from Exhibit A and reflect the IP address, not a named person. “Not on the documents we have” means that detail is not on the court documents we have reviewed so far, not that it is missing from the case. For the October 30 cases on Long Island, see Strike 3 Holdings New York: October 30 filings. For all New York filings in one place, see our Strike 3 Holdings New York lawsuits hub. For how these letters work in general, see our ISP letter guide.

What the Exhibit A details show

  • 12 cases in one day. All 12 Strike 3 Holdings New York cases were filed in the Southern District of New York on November 2, 2026.
  • 403 works in total. The 12 Exhibit A documents list between 24 and 55 works each. The largest, 7:26-cv-09590, lists 55 works (09/18/2026 to 10/10/2026).
  • Five different communities. The IP addresses trace to New York, NY (8 cases), New Rochelle, NY, Mount Vernon, NY, Stormville, NY, and White Plains, NY.
  • Three providers. Seven cases involve Verizon Fios; three cases involve Optimum Online; two cases involve Spectrum.
  • Very different time spans. In 1:26-cv-09580 the activity listed covers 11 days (10/10/2026 to 10/20/2026). In 1:26-cv-09582 it runs from 01/19/2024 to 10/15/2026.
  • Recent activity. The latest date listed in any of the Exhibit A documents is 10/22/2026, 11 days before filing.
  • Overlapping titles. Six file hashes appear in more than one Strike 3 Holdings New York Exhibit A, so the same titles show up across different cases.

These details matter because the account holder named in a later subpoena response is not always the person who used the connection. A shared home network, a roommate, a guest, or an open router can all sit behind one IP address.

Judges and early subpoena motions in the Strike 3 Holdings New York cases

We checked court records for all 12 Strike 3 Holdings New York cases on November 3, 2026. As of November 3, 2026, the assigned judge was not on the documents we have for these cases. We will add it once the docket shows it. The court lists its judges on its judges page.

Docket Courthouse location Assigned judge Early subpoena motion Order
1:26-cv-09568 Manhattan Not yet assigned (docket checked 11/03/2026) Not filed as of 11/03/2026 None yet
1:26-cv-09571 Manhattan Not on the documents we have Not on the documents we have None yet
1:26-cv-09574 Manhattan Not yet assigned (docket checked 11/03/2026) Not filed as of 11/03/2026 None yet
1:26-cv-09576 Manhattan Not yet assigned (docket checked 11/03/2026) Not filed as of 11/03/2026 None yet
1:26-cv-09578 Manhattan Not yet assigned (docket checked 11/03/2026) Not filed as of 11/03/2026 None yet
1:26-cv-09579 Manhattan Not yet assigned (docket checked 11/03/2026) Not filed as of 11/03/2026 None yet
1:26-cv-09580 Manhattan Not yet assigned (docket checked 11/03/2026) Not filed as of 11/03/2026 None yet
1:26-cv-09582 Manhattan Not yet assigned (docket checked 11/03/2026) Not filed as of 11/03/2026 None yet
7:26-cv-09585 White Plains Not yet assigned (docket checked 11/03/2026) Not filed as of 11/03/2026 None yet
7:26-cv-09589 White Plains Not yet assigned (docket checked 11/03/2026) Not filed as of 11/03/2026 None yet
7:26-cv-09590 White Plains Not yet assigned (docket checked 11/03/2026) Not filed as of 11/03/2026 None yet
7:26-cv-09591 White Plains Not yet assigned (docket checked 11/03/2026) Not filed as of 11/03/2026 None yet

What the pattern shows

As of November 3, 2026, none of the 11 dockets we reviewed has a motion asking to subpoena the internet provider yet, so no order and no order conditions exist so far in those cases. We had not yet reviewed the full docket for the remaining case (1:26-cv-09571) by publication time.

That is normal this early in a case. The next step is usually a motion for leave to serve a subpoena on the provider before the discovery conference. Once a judge rules, the order sets the conditions the provider and Strike 3 Holdings must follow, such as limiting the request to a name and address and setting a notice period. Because each judge writes their own order, the conditions can differ from case to case. You can see how judges handled earlier Strike 3 Holdings requests in New York on our Strike 3 Holdings New York lawsuits hub.

What this means if you are the John Doe

  • No letter has gone out yet in these cases. A provider letter normally follows a court order, and none of these Strike 3 Holdings New York cases has one so far.
  • The letter will name the case. When it arrives, it should list the court, the docket number, and the IP address. Compare them with the table above.
  • The letter sets your timeline. The date in your provider’s letter is the date to plan around.
  • Your name is not in the public case. At this stage each case lists only an IP address.

What you Can Learn

Our short videos explain some of the important things to know about the Strike 3 Holdings lawsuit process, and your main options right now.

Many clients have told us our videos are very helpful. Click the image below to watch.

Strike 3: Start Here video playlist from Antonelli Law

What usually happens next in Strike 3 Holdings New York cases

  1. Strike 3 Holdings files a John Doe complaint identified only by an IP address. That step is done in all 12 cases.
  2. It asks the court for permission to subpoena the internet provider before the usual discovery conference. As of November 3, 2026, we have not seen that request filed in any of these cases.
  3. If the court agrees, the provider notifies the account holder. That is the letter most people receive.
  4. After the notice period in the court order, the provider may release the account holder’s name and address unless something is filed.

Use the dates in your own letter. Timelines in Strike 3 Holdings New York cases depend on the judge and on the terms of each order. In these Strike 3 Holdings New York cases, the internet providers listed are Verizon Fios (7 cases), Optimum Online (3 cases), and Spectrum (2 cases). Those providers would send the subpoena letter for those cases. Our ISP letter guide explains what the letter means.

Clients we have represented in New York

Antonelli Law® has represented about 291 clients who live in New York in federal copyright matters since 2015. We handle Strike 3 Holdings New York matters by phone, email, and secure upload through our contact page, so you do not need to travel to Manhattan or White Plains to talk with us.

Our New York clients have lived in Albany, Alden, Amherst, Amsterdam, Arverne, Astoria, Baldwin, Ballston Lake, Ballston Spa, Bayside, Bernhards Bay, Binghamton, Blue Point, Bohemia, Brentwood, Briarwood, Bronx, Bronxville, Brooklyn, Buffalo, Cambria Heights, Canandaigua, Castleton, Center Moriches, Chappaqua, Cheektowaga, Chittenango, Clarence Center, Clinton, College Point, Commack, Coram, Cornwall on Hudson, Corona, Cortland, Croton on Hudson, Cuddebackville, DeWitt, East Amherst, East Aurora, East Elmhurst, East Islip, East Northport, Eastchester, Elmhurst, Elmont, Endicott, Fairport, Far Rockaway, Farmingdale, Fishkill, Flushing, Forest Hills, Fort Salonga, Fresh Meadows, Glen Cove, Glen Head, Glenwood, Goshen, Great Neck, Hartsdale, Hauppauge, Hempstead, Hewlett, Hicksville, Highland, and Highland Mills.

We have also represented New York clients in Hilton, Hollis, Holtsville, Howard Beach, Huntington Station, Islip, Ithaca, Jamaica, Jamesville, Jeffersonville, Jericho, Johnson City, Kenmore, Kings Park, Kingston, Larchmont, Latham, Laurel, Laurelton, Levittown, Lindenhurst, Little Neck, Liverpool, Lockport, Long Island City, Lynbrook, Mahopac, Malta, Mamaroneck, Manhasset, Massapequa, Mastic Beach, McGraw, Medford, Merrick, Middle Village, Middletown, Minoa, Mount Marion, Mount Vernon, Nanuet, New City, New Hartford, New Hyde Park, New York, Newburgh, Niskayuna, North Babylon, North Chili, Northport, Oakland Gardens, Oceanside, Old Bethpage, Orchard Park, Ozone Park, Pawling, Peekskill, Plainview, Port Jefferson, Port Washington, Poughkeepsie, Pound Ridge, Queens, Queens Village, and Rego Park.

We have also represented New York clients in Rhinebeck, Ridgewood, Rochester, Rockville Centre, Ronkonkoma, Saranac Lake, Saratoga Springs, Scarsdale, Schenectady, Scotia, Sea Cliff, Selden, Sinclairville, Smithtown, South Farmingdale, South Floral Park, South Jamesport, South Ozone Park, Southampton, Staten Island, Suffern, Sunnyside, Syosset, Syracuse, Tonawanda, Troy, Tuxedo, Utica, Valhalla, Valley Stream, Waterville, Webster, West Babylon, West Bloomfield, West Islip, West Monroe, West Nyack, West Seneca, Westbury, Wheatley Heights, White Plains, Whitestone, Woodside, Yonkers, and Yorktown Heights.

Attorney Highlight: Alec Dardis

Alec Dardis, Associate at Antonelli Law

Alec Dardis is an Associate at Antonelli Law®. Born and raised in Southern California (Orange County area), he was a competitive junior tennis player and captain of the Men’s Division 1 tennis team at Colgate University, where he earned a Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy. He later received the Dean’s Scholarship to DePaul University College of Law, earned a CALI Award in Negotiations, made Dean’s List, and graduated with a Juris Doctor and a Certificate in Intellectual Property. He is licensed in Illinois and handles federal copyright matters nationwide.

In the firm’s BitTorrent practice, Alec has personally assisted hundreds of clients with cases involving copyright holders, including Strike 3 Holdings. He handles the consultation, the reading of the letter, settlement talks when that is what the client wants, and court defense when that is the better path.

Phone: (312) 201-8310. Email: adardis@antonelli-law.com.

Book with Alec · Alec’s bio

Clients Appreciate Our Communication & Results

Here is just one client review of Alec Dardis. Click the link below for many others.

Posted by anonymous | September 30, 2026 | Hired Attorney

Highly Recommend Alec Van Dardis

“We had a consultation with Alec and he explained our options in detail. He made us feel comfortable and gave us time to ask a lot of questions. At the end of the consultation we made another appointment so we could decide which option to take. We felt that we were in good hands starting with consultation. Alec was thorough in explaining every step, what we needed to do and the timing. He was a great communicator, always followed up and very professional. We are very grateful for all Alec did to get this case closed. We would highly recommend Alec to others that need his expertise.”

View original review on Avvo

Got an ISP letter about a Strike 3 Holdings New York case?

Most people we talk with want a quiet, anonymous resolution. We also defend cases in court when that is the better path. The first step is simply a free, confidential consultation about your letter and the documents in your case.

Call or tap: (312) 201-8310

Or email or upload your documents through our contact page, or choose an attorney and book a time below.

Schedule Your Free Confidential Strike 3 Holdings Consultation

Speak directly with our team. Choose the attorney you prefer. A consultation is not a decision to go to court.

Alec Dardis

Alec Dardis

Paul Sanders

Paul Sanders

Melissa Ross

Melissa Ross

Jeffrey Antonelli

Jeffrey Antonelli

Book a Free ConsultationCall (312) 201-8310

Frequently asked questions

Do I need a New York lawyer for a Strike 3 Holdings case?

No. Strike 3 Holdings New York cases are federal copyright cases. Antonelli Law® handles Strike 3 Holdings matters in federal courts nationwide, and you can work with us by phone, email, and upload.

Which courthouse is my case in?

Look at the first digit of the docket number on your letter or court order. In the Southern District of New York, 1: is Manhattan and 7: is White Plains.

Will my name be public?

At the subpoena stage the case usually lists only an IP address. Many people resolve these matters confidentially through counsel, often without their name appearing in the public record.

What if I did not download anything?

The person who pays for the internet account is not always the person who used it. That difference can matter a great deal, and it is worth discussing in a free, confidential consultation before you respond to anyone.

Related reading

This page is general information about Strike 3 Holdings and similar BitTorrent copyright cases. It is not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every case is different. Client reviews describe individual experiences. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Antonelli Law® defends people and businesses against copyright claims and does not represent copyright holders. Attorney advertising. Information is current as of November 3, 2026.

TORRENT DEFENDERS® is a federally registered trademark owned exclusively by the Law Offices of Jeffrey J. Antonelli, Ltd. dba Antonelli Law®.

Share