Strike 3 Holdings LLC Adds DC to Lawsuit Campaign – ISP Subpoena Defense

Share

STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS ISP Subpoena: STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS , the movie company behind the adult entertainment brands Tushy, Vixen, and Blacked is suing DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (WASHINGTON, DC), CALIFORNIA, CONNECTICUT, NEW YORK, NEW JERSEY, MICHIGAN, AND PENNSYLVANIA area users for using computer file-sharing software to obtain its movie for free.

Did you receive a copyright infringement notice from your internet service provider (ISP), and a subpoena from STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS for the illegal download of the adult entertainment movies by ‘Tushy, Vixen, and Blacked”? Don’t panic, we’re here to help.

Why Did I Receive a Subpoena from STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS?

The STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS subpoena probably relates to a federal copyright infringement lawsuit. Essentially, STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS is alleging that someone in the home or office illegally downloaded Tushy, Vixen, or Blacked films produced using file-sharing software such as BitTorrent without paying a license fee.


Set up a free consultation to discuss the specifics of your case, or keep reading below for more information on what you can expect from your case with STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS.


What Do I Do About My STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS ISP Subpoena?

Firstly and most importantly- don’t ignore it! You have a limited amount of time to decide what to do; the longer you leave it, the fewer choices you’ll have. Typically, you have anywhere from two weeks to one month after receiving the ISP letter and STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS subpoena to decide what to do.

Secondly, deleting anything could make the penalties worse, don’t try to hide anything.

Don’t Sign Anything Before Speaking with a Copyright Defense Attorney

If you receive a Waiver of Service of Summons form in the mail, don’t sign it before speaking with an experienced attorney. Signing the Waiver of Service of Summons form you received in the mail from the movie company’s lawyer will in some cases lead to an unfair default or consent judgments against you.

Speaking with an experienced attorney with a background in ISP subpoena defense can help you make informed decisions about how to process. Antonelli Law provides free copyright infringement consultations to those DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (WASHINGTON, DC), CALIFORNIA, CONNECTICUT, NEW YORK, NEW JERSEY, MICHIGAN, AND PENNSYLVANIA area users being sued by STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS.

If you want to read more about recent cases of ISP users in copyright infringement allegation lawsuits, consider this article by Jeffrey Antonelli about “copyright troll” litigation, published by the Illinois State Bar Association’s Intellectual Property Section. It speaks to our expertise in this field of litigation.

Once you’ve spoken to an experienced ISP Subpoena Defense Attorney, you’ll understand your specific case better, but generally, you have three options:

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (WASHINGTON, DC), CALIFORNIA, CONNECTICUT, NEW YORK, NEW JERSEY, MICHIGAN, AND PENNSYLVANIA Defendants’ Options for the STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS Copyright Infringement Claims:

  • Resolve the case anonymously
  • File a motion to quash before it gets to court
  • Prepare to fight your case in court

Antonelli Law knows how to help you figure out the best action for your subpoena defense and the STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS Copyright Infringement Claims. We’re the nation’s most experienced BT copyright defense firm, with a record of having helped nearly 2,000 people across the country accused of downloading movies over the internet in the types of lawsuits such as the one brought by STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS against DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (WASHINGTON, DC), CALIFORNIA, CONNECTICUT, NEW YORK, NEW JERSEY, MICHIGAN, AND PENNSYLVANIA area users over the movies by Tushy, Vixen, and Blacked films.


Contact us to see which option is best for your STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS case.


Resolving Your STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS Copyright Infringement Case Anonymously

The easiest and most common way to resolve your STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS case is out of court. Choosing this option allows you to settle anonymously. At Antonelli Law, we charge a flat legal fee of somewhere between $1,500 to $2,000 for anonymous settlements.

Filing a Motion to Quash the STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS Subpoena You Received

The motion to quash argues that the lawsuit’s complaints claiming copyright infringement only claim a few ‘bits’ of data were transmitted by the IP address and user in question, therefore they do not provide enough evidence to make a claim on copyright infringement, and the court should throw out the copyright infringement lawsuit brought by STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS due to deficiency, then the court should also quash the subpoena for the user in question. At Antonelli Law, we offer a flat rate for filing motions to quash a subpoena.

This option is not without risks. Contact Antonelli’s experienced ISP subpoena defense lawyers to discuss this option further.

Preparing to Fight Your STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS Case in Court

When choosing to fight a copyright infringement lawsuit brought against you by STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, for the illegal downloading of the move Tushy, Vixen, and Blacked films, Antonelli Law should be your first choice for defense.

We have local counsel coast to coast, to help us efficiently settle or fight lawsuits brought against our clients. We offer free consultations where we explain what you can expect when fighting this copyright infringement lawsuit from STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS in court. After that, we charge an hourly fee.

There are many defense standpoints from which we can tenaciously work to fight the copyright infringement lawsuit brought against DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (WASHINGTON, DC), CALIFORNIA, CONNECTICUT, NEW YORK, NEW JERSEY, MICHIGAN, AND PENNSYLVANIA users by STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS over the ADULT ENTERTAINMENT MOVIES BY TUSHY, VIXEN, and BLACKED films. One of the most common forms of defense is claiming that the user who transmitted the data for the movies by Tushy, Vixen, and Blacked films through a BitTorrent is not the user at this IP address.

This is a strong defense because the copyright infringement lawsuit brought against the defendant assumes that the defendant used their own IP address to transmit the data for the movie. However, hackers often disguise their IP addresses when illegally transmitting data online, so in many cases, the defendant is not at fault and did not commit copyright infringement by downloading Tushy, Vixen, and Blacked films over a bit torrent.

Why Choose Antonelli Law as Your Experienced ISP Subpoena Defense Law Firm in DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (WASHINGTON, DC), CALIFORNIA, CONNECTICUT, NEW YORK, NEW JERSEY, MICHIGAN, AND PENNSYLVANIA?

  • We offer fair and competitive prices, which are no more expensive than hiring a local DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (WASHINGTON, DC), CALIFORNIA, CONNECTICUT, NEW YORK, NEW JERSEY, MICHIGAN, AND PENNSYLVANIA attorney, and we are able to represent you in your federal case
  • This area of law is fast paced and changes happen rapidly, so we are continuously following the latest developments in cases nationwide
  • We have years of experience representing ISP users accused of Bit Torrent copyright infringement and helping to resolve nearly 2000 cases
  • We have strong credentials standing behind our arguments and the other side is well aware of this
  • We understand the panic or anxiety you may feel at receiving a copyright infringement lawsuit from STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS over the movie Tushy, Vixen, and Blacked films, and we are experienced in helping DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (WASHINGTON, DC), CALIFORNIA, CONNECTICUT, NEW YORK, NEW JERSEY, MICHIGAN, AND PENNSYLVANIA area users make calm, informed decisions throughout this process

Ready to take the first step in resolving the STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS copyright infringement allegations brought against DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (WASHINGTON, DC), CALIFORNIA, CONNECTICUT, NEW YORK, NEW JERSEY, MICHIGAN, AND PENNSYLVANIA users over the movie, Tushy, Vixen, and Blacked films?

Contact us today.


 

District of Columbia
• Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DOE

    • 1:17-cv-02342

• Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DOE

    • 1:17-cv-02344

• Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DOE

    • 1:17-cv-02345

• Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DOE

    • 1:17-cv-02346

• Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DOE

    • 1:17-cv-02347

New Jersey
• Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 69.141.228.16

    • 1:17-cv-10276

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 73.196.168.172

    • 1:17-cv-10285


Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 73.195.102.8

    • 2:17-cv-10290


Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 24.191.216.200

    • 2:17-cv-10297


Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 100.35.227.188

    • 2:17-cv-10300


Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 173.54.7.225

    • 2:17-cv-10305


Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 73.194.91.109

    • 3:17-cv-10308


Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 100.35.148.30

    • 3:17-cv-10314


John C. Atkin of the law firm Fox Rothschild LLP represent Strike 3 Holdings LLC in New Jersey

Pennsylvania

    • 2:17-cv-04797

• STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. JOHN DOE

    • 2:17-cv-04798

• STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. JOHN DOE

    • 2:17-cv-04802

• STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. JOHN DOE

    • 2:17-cv-04803

• STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. JOHN DOE

    • 2:17-cv-04804

• STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. JOHN DOE

    • 2:17-cv-04805

• STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. JOHN DOE
Attorneys Christian Moffitt and Andrew Bonekemper of the law firm Fox Rothschild LLP represent Strike 3 Holdings LLC in Pennsylvania

California
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DOE

    • 5:17-cv-05960

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 73.252.213.89

    • 5:17-cv-05963

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 75.25.143.119

    • 4:17-cv-05964

Attorney Lincoln D. Bandlow of the law firm Fox Rothschild LLP represent Strike 3 Holdings LLC in California

Connecticut
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe

    • 5:17-cv-01667

Attorney Jacqueline M. James represents Strike 3 Holdings LLC in Connecticut cases.

New York
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe:

    • 1:2017-cv-07351
    • 1:2017-cv-07350
    • 1:2017-cv-07349
    • 1:2017-cv-07345
    • 1:2017-cv-07347
    • 2:2017-cv-05636
    • 1:2017-cv-07343
    • 2:2017-cv-05637
    • 2:2017-cv-05630
    • 1:2017-cv-07353
    • 1:2017-cv-07346
    • 1:2017-cv-07344
    • 2:2017-cv-05633
    • 7:2017-cv-07355
    • 2:2017-cv-05635
    • 2:2017-cv-05634
    • 1:2017-cv-07348
    • 2:2017-cv-05638
    • 2:2017-cv-05606
    • 1:2017-cv-07352
    • 2:2017-cv-05631
    • 7:2017-cv-07354

Attorney Jacqueline M. James represents Strike 3 Holdings LLC in New York cases.

See Also:

How Strike 3 Holdings Obtains Your Name From An IP Address – ISP Subpoena Defense

Strike 3 Defendants Receiving Charter ISP Notices – ISP Subpoena Defense

Strike 3 Holdings LLC Suing Pennsylvania Internet Users for Free Porn Downloads – ISP Subpoena Defense

Strike 3 Holdings LLC Subpoenas in Connecticut to ISPs Allowed – ISP Subpoena Defense

Strike 3 Holdings LLC Suing New Jersey Internet Users For Free Porn Downloads – ISP Subpoena Defense

 

Share

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Website Apps