Strike 3 Holdings New York: 10 New Cases (Free Guide)
Strike 3 Holdings New York filings kept coming on October 28, 2026, when Strike 3 Holdings filed 10 new John Doe copyright cases in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Each case names one internet subscriber identified only by an IP address. Below you will find every case, the Exhibit A details, the assigned judges, where each case stands in court records as of October 29, 2026, and what usually comes next. If your internet provider sends you a letter about one of these cases, call or tap (312) 201-8310 for a free, confidential consultation.
Strike 3 Holdings New York filings: 10 cases filed October 28, 2026
All 10 cases were filed the same day. The “1:” at the start of each docket number is the courthouse location in Brooklyn. The table lists details from each case’s Exhibit A, the document attached to the complaint that lists the IP address, the approximate location, the internet provider, and the works Strike 3 Holdings says were shared. Links in the Docket column open the Exhibit A and, where available, the complaint for each case. In these Eastern District of New York cases the IP address also appears in the case caption.
| Filed | Docket | IP address | City | ISP | Works listed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/28/2026 | 1:26-cv-06917 Exhibit A · Complaint |
207.38.183.112 | Queens, NY | Astound Broadband | 79 |
| 10/28/2026 | 1:26-cv-06919 Exhibit A · Complaint |
47.20.50.85 | Brooklyn, NY | Optimum Online | 24 |
| 10/28/2026 | 1:26-cv-06920 Exhibit A · Complaint |
108.41.43.155 | Brooklyn, NY | Verizon Fios | 47 |
| 10/28/2026 | 1:26-cv-06921 Exhibit A · Complaint |
150.221.99.145 | Staten Island, NY | Spectrum | 54 |
| 10/28/2026 | 1:26-cv-06922 Exhibit A · Complaint |
100.2.74.213 | Brooklyn, NY | Verizon Fios | 43 |
| 10/28/2026 | 1:26-cv-06923 Exhibit A · Complaint |
108.29.208.116 | Queens, NY | Verizon Fios | 36 |
| 10/28/2026 | 1:26-cv-06924 Exhibit A · Complaint |
69.121.48.58 | Brooklyn, NY | Optimum Online | 25 |
| 10/28/2026 | 1:26-cv-06925 Exhibit A · Complaint |
108.21.247.139 | Queens, NY | Verizon Fios | 25 |
| 10/28/2026 | 1:26-cv-06926 Exhibit A · Complaint |
71.249.48.205 | Brooklyn, NY | Verizon Fios | 25 |
| 10/28/2026 | 1:26-cv-06927 Exhibit A · Complaint |
74.72.186.130 | Brooklyn, NY | Spectrum | 45 |
Source: court records for each case, including the complaint and Exhibit A, as of October 29, 2026. The city and provider come from Exhibit A and reflect the IP address, not a named person. For all New York filings in one place, see our Strike 3 Holdings New York lawsuits hub and our Eastern District of New York page. For how these letters work in general, see our ISP letter guide.
What the Exhibit A details show
- 403 works in total. The 10 Exhibit A documents we have list between 24 and 79 works each. The largest, 1:26-cv-06917, lists 79 works (01/14/2024 to 10/13/2026).
- Three different communities. Six IP addresses trace to Brooklyn. Three IP addresses trace to Queens. The others trace to Staten Island.
- Four providers. Five cases involve Verizon Fios; two cases involve Optimum Online; two cases involve Spectrum; one case involves Astound Broadband.
- Very different time spans. In 1:26-cv-06926 the activity listed covers 58 days (08/16/2026 to 10/12/2026). In 1:26-cv-06917 it runs from 01/14/2024 to 10/13/2026.
- Recent activity. The latest date listed in any of the Exhibit A documents is 10/23/2026, five days before filing.
- Overlapping titles. 16 file hashes appear in more than one Strike 3 Holdings New York Exhibit A, so the same titles show up across different cases.
These details matter because the account holder named in a later subpoena response is not always the person who used the connection. A shared home network, a roommate, a guest, or an open router can all sit behind one IP address.
Judges and early subpoena motions in the Strike 3 Holdings New York cases
We checked court records for all 10 Strike 3 Holdings New York cases on October 29, 2026. Five of the 10 Strike 3 Holdings New York cases already have an assigned district judge. The other five (1:26-cv-06920, 1:26-cv-06921, 1:26-cv-06922, 1:26-cv-06923, and 1:26-cv-06924) showed no judge assignment when we checked. The court lists its judges on its judges page.
| Docket | Courthouse location | Assigned judge | Early subpoena motion | Order |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1:26-cv-06917 | Brooklyn | Judge Diane Gujarati Magistrate Judge Clay H. Kaminsky |
Not filed as of 10/29/2026 | None yet |
| 1:26-cv-06919 | Brooklyn | Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy |
Not filed as of 10/29/2026 | None yet |
| 1:26-cv-06920 | Brooklyn | Not yet assigned as of 10/29/2026 | Not filed as of 10/29/2026 | None yet |
| 1:26-cv-06921 | Brooklyn | Not yet assigned as of 10/29/2026 | Not filed as of 10/29/2026 | None yet |
| 1:26-cv-06922 | Brooklyn | Not yet assigned as of 10/29/2026 | Not filed as of 10/29/2026 | None yet |
| 1:26-cv-06923 | Brooklyn | Not yet assigned as of 10/29/2026 | Not filed as of 10/29/2026 | None yet |
| 1:26-cv-06924 | Brooklyn | Not yet assigned as of 10/29/2026 | Not filed as of 10/29/2026 | None yet |
| 1:26-cv-06925 | Brooklyn | Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Marutollo |
Not filed as of 10/29/2026 | None yet |
| 1:26-cv-06926 | Brooklyn | Judge Nina R. Morrison Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry |
Not filed as of 10/29/2026 | None yet |
| 1:26-cv-06927 | Brooklyn | Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis Magistrate Judge Lara K. Eshkenazi |
Not filed as of 10/29/2026 | None yet |
What the pattern shows
Five different district judges drew the five assigned Strike 3 Holdings New York cases. Judge Diane Gujarati, Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr., Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall, Judge Nina R. Morrison, and Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis each have one case.
Magistrate judges referred so far: Magistrate Judge Clay H. Kaminsky, Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy, Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Marutollo, Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry, and Magistrate Judge Lara K. Eshkenazi. In many districts the magistrate judge is the one who rules on an early subpoena request.
As of October 29, 2026, none of the dockets has a motion asking to subpoena the internet provider yet, so no order and no order conditions exist so far.
That is normal this early in a case. The next step is usually a motion for leave to serve a subpoena on the provider before the discovery conference. Once a judge rules, the order sets the conditions the provider and Strike 3 Holdings must follow, such as limiting the request to a name and address and setting a notice period. Because each judge writes their own order, the conditions can differ from case to case. You can see how quickly judges ruled in another district on our Strike 3 Holdings Illinois lawsuits page.
What this means if you are the John Doe
- No letter has gone out yet in these cases. A provider letter normally follows a court order, and none of these Strike 3 Holdings New York cases has one so far.
- The letter will name the case. When it arrives, it should list the court, the docket number, and the IP address. Compare them with the table above.
- The letter sets your timeline. The date in your provider’s letter is the date to plan around.
- Your name is not in the public case. At this stage each case lists only an IP address.
What you Can Learn
Our short videos explain some of the important things to know about the Strike 3 Holdings lawsuit process, and your main options right now.
Many clients have told us our videos are very helpful. Click the image below to watch.
What usually happens next in Strike 3 Holdings New York cases
- Strike 3 Holdings files a John Doe complaint identified only by an IP address. That step is done in all 10 cases.
- It asks the court for permission to subpoena the internet provider before the usual discovery conference. As of October 29, 2026, that request has not been filed in any of these cases.
- If the court agrees, the provider notifies the account holder. That is the letter most people receive.
- After the notice period in the court order, the provider may release the account holder’s name and address unless something is filed.
Use the dates in your own letter. Timelines in Strike 3 Holdings New York cases depend on the judge and on the terms of each order. See our provider pages for Verizon, AT&T Internet, Spectrum, Cox, Optimum, and Frontier.
Clients we have represented in New York
Antonelli Law® has represented 291 clients who live in New York in federal copyright matters. We handle Strike 3 Holdings New York matters by phone, email, and secure upload through our contact page, so you do not need to travel to Brooklyn to talk with us.
Our New York clients have lived in Albany, Alden, Amherst, Amsterdam, Arverne, Astoria, Baldwin, Ballston Lake, Ballston Spa, Bayside, Bernhards Bay, Binghamton, Blue Point, Bohemia, Brentwood, Briarwood, Bronx, Bronxville, Brooklyn, Buffalo, Cambria Heights, Canandaigua, Castleton, Center Moriches, Chappaqua, Cheektowaga, Chittenango, Clarence Center, Clinton, College Point, Commack, Coram, Cornwall on Hudson, Corona, Cortland, Croton on Hudson, Cuddebackville, DeWitt, East Amherst, East Aurora, East Elmhurst, East Islip, East Northport, Eastchester, Elmhurst, Elmont, Endicott, Fairport, Far Rockaway, Farmingdale, Fishkill, Flushing, Forest Hills, Fort Salonga, Fresh Meadows, Glen Cove, Glen Head, Glenwood, and Goshen.
We have also represented New York clients in Great Neck, Hartsdale, Hauppauge, Hempstead, Hewlett, Hicksville, Highland, Highland Mills, Hilton, Hollis, Holtsville, Howard Beach, Huntington Station, Islip, Ithaca, Jamaica, Jamesville, Jeffersonville, Jericho, Johnson City, Kenmore, Kings Park, Kingston, Larchmont, Latham, Laurel, Laurelton, Levittown, Lindenhurst, Little Neck, Liverpool, Lockport, Long Island City, Lynbrook, Mahopac, Malta, Mamaroneck, Manhasset, Massapequa, Mastic Beach, McGraw, Medford, Merrick, Middle Village, Middletown, Minoa, Mount Marion, Mount Vernon, Nanuet, New City, New Hartford, New Hyde Park, New York, Newburgh, Niskayuna, North Babylon, North Chili, Northport, and Oakland Gardens.
We have also represented New York clients in Oceanside, Old Bethpage, Orchard Park, Ozone Park, Pawling, Peekskill, Plainview, Port Jefferson, Port Washington, Poughkeepsie, Pound Ridge, Queens, Queens Village, Rego Park, Rhinebeck, Ridgewood, Rochester, Rockville Centre, Ronkonkoma, Saranac Lake, Saratoga Springs, Scarsdale, Schenectady, Scotia, Sea Cliff, Selden, Sinclairville, Smithtown, South Farmingdale, South Floral Park, South Jamesport, South Ozone Park, Southampton, Staten Island, Suffern, Sunnyside, Syosset, Syracuse, Tonawanda, Troy, Tuxedo, Utica, Valhalla, Valley Stream, Waterville, Webster, West Babylon, West Bloomfield, West Islip, West Monroe, West Nyack, West Seneca, Westbury, Wheatley Heights, White Plains, Whitestone, Woodside, Yonkers, and Yorktown Heights.
Attorney Highlight: Alec Dardis
Alec Dardis is an Associate at Antonelli Law®. Born and raised in Southern California (Orange County area), he was a competitive junior tennis player and captain of the Men’s Division 1 tennis team at Colgate University, where he earned a Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy. He later received the Dean’s Scholarship to DePaul University College of Law, earned a CALI Award in Negotiations, made Dean’s List, and graduated with a Juris Doctor and a Certificate in Intellectual Property. He is licensed in Illinois and handles federal copyright matters nationwide.
In the firm’s BitTorrent practice, Alec has personally assisted hundreds of clients with cases involving copyright holders, including Strike 3 Holdings. He handles the consultation, the reading of the letter, settlement talks when that is what the client wants, and court defense when that is the better path.
Phone: (312) 201-8310. Email: adardis@antonelli-law.com.
Clients Appreciate Our Communication & Results
Here is just one client review of Alec Dardis. Click the link below for many others.
Posted by anonymous | September 30, 2026 | Hired Attorney
Highly Recommend Alec Van Dardis
“We had a consultation with Alec and he explained our options in detail. He made us feel comfortable and gave us time to ask a lot of questions. At the end of the consultation we made another appointment so we could decide which option to take. We felt that we were in good hands starting with consultation. Alec was thorough in explaining every step, what we needed to do and the timing. He was a great communicator, always followed up and very professional. We are very grateful for all Alec did to get this case closed. We would highly recommend Alec to others that need his expertise.”
Got an ISP letter about a Strike 3 Holdings New York case?
Most people we talk with want a quiet, anonymous resolution. We also defend cases in court when that is the better path. The first step is simply a free, confidential consultation about your letter and the documents in your case.
Call or tap: (312) 201-8310
Or email or upload your documents through our contact page, or choose an attorney and book a time below.
Schedule Your Free Confidential Strike 3 Holdings Consultation
Speak directly with our team. Choose the attorney you prefer. A consultation is not a decision to go to court.

Melissa Ross

Alec Dardis

Jeffrey Antonelli

Paul Sanders
Frequently asked questions
Do I need a New York lawyer for a Strike 3 Holdings case?
Strike 3 Holdings New York cases are federal copyright cases. Antonelli Law® handles Strike 3 Holdings matters in federal courts nationwide, and you can work with us by phone, email, and upload.
My letter lists an IP address. How do I find my case?
In these Eastern District of New York cases the IP address appears in the case caption. Find the IP address from your letter in the table above, then confirm the docket number. Send the letter to us and we will check it with you.
Will my name be public?
At the subpoena stage the case usually lists only an IP address. Many people resolve these matters confidentially through counsel, often without their name appearing in the public record.
What if I did not download anything?
The person who pays for the internet account is not always the person who used it. That difference can matter a great deal, and it is worth discussing in a free, confidential consultation before you respond to anyone.
Related reading
- Strike 3 Holdings ISP letter guide
- Strike 3 Holdings ISP notices
- Strike 3 Holdings FAQ
- Strike 3 Holdings Illinois lawsuits: filings, courts and help
This page is general information about Strike 3 Holdings and similar BitTorrent copyright cases. It is not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every case is different. Client reviews describe individual experiences. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Antonelli Law® defends people and businesses against copyright claims and does not represent copyright holders. Attorney advertising. Information is current as of October 29, 2026.
TORRENT DEFENDERS® is a federally registered trademark owned exclusively by the Law Offices of Jeffrey J. Antonelli, Ltd. dba Antonelli Law®.


