Strike 3 Holdings Tennessee: 2 New Cases (Free Guide)
Did your internet provider send you a letter about a Strike 3 Holdings Tennessee case filed November 4, 2026? On November 4, 2026, Strike 3 Holdings filed two new John Doe copyright cases in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Memphis courthouse. Each case names one internet subscriber identified only by an IP address. Below you will find every case, the Exhibit A details, the assigned judges where court records show one, where each case stands as of November 5, 2026, and what usually comes next. If your internet provider sends you a letter about one of these cases, call or tap (312) 201-8310 for a free, confidential consultation.
Strike 3 Holdings Tennessee filings: 2 Memphis cases filed November 4, 2026
Both cases were filed the same day, numbered from 2:26-cv-03489 to 2:26-cv-03490. The “2:” at the start of each docket number is the courthouse location in Memphis.
The table lists details from each case’s Exhibit A, the document attached to the complaint that lists the IP address, the approximate location, the internet provider, and the works Strike 3 Holdings says were shared. Links in the Docket column open the Exhibit A and, where available, the complaint for each case. In these cases the caption names only a John Doe, so the IP address comes from the Exhibit A.
| Filed | Docket | IP address | City | ISP | Works listed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/04/2026 | 2:26-cv-03489 Exhibit A |
73.177.94.136 | Cordova, TN | Comcast Cable | 27 |
| 11/04/2026 | 2:26-cv-03490 Exhibit A |
73.59.149.251 | Memphis, TN | Comcast Cable | 35 |
Source: court records for each case, including the complaint and Exhibit A, as of November 5, 2026. The city and provider come from Exhibit A and reflect the IP address, not a named person. “Not on the papers we have” means that detail is not on the court documents we have reviewed so far, not that it is missing from the case. For Tennessee trends and earlier filings, see our Strike 3 Holdings Tennessee lawsuits trends page. For how these letters work in general, see our ISP letter guide.
What the Exhibit A details show
- Two new Memphis cases. Both were filed in the Western District of Tennessee on November 4, 2026.
- Memphis and Somerville clients. Antonelli Law® has represented Tennessee clients in Memphis and Somerville, among other verified Tennessee cities listed below.
- 62 works in total. The two Exhibit A documents list between 27 and 35 works each. The largest, 2:26-cv-03490, lists 35 works (07/17/2026 to 10/10/2026).
- Two different communities. The IP addresses trace to Cordova, TN and Memphis, TN.
- One provider. Two cases involve Comcast Cable.
- Very different time spans. In 2:26-cv-03489 the activity listed covers 47 days (09/06/2026 to 10/22/2026). In 2:26-cv-03490 it runs from 07/17/2026 to 10/10/2026.
- Recent activity. The latest date listed in any of the Exhibit A documents is 10/22/2026, 13 days before filing.
- Overlapping titles. One file hash appears in more than one Strike 3 Holdings Tennessee Exhibit A, so the same titles show up across different cases.
These details matter because the account holder named in a later subpoena response is not always the person who used the connection. A shared home network, a roommate, a guest, or an open router can all sit behind one IP address.
Judges and early subpoena motions in the Strike 3 Holdings Tennessee cases
We checked court records for all 2 Strike 3 Holdings Tennessee cases on November 5, 2026. Every case already has an assigned judge. The Western District of Tennessee lists its judges on its judges page.
| Docket | Courthouse location | Assigned judge | Early subpoena motion | Order |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2:26-cv-03489 | Memphis | Judge Sheryl H. Lipman Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham |
Not filed as of 11/05/2026 | None yet |
| 2:26-cv-03490 | Memphis | Judge Thomas L. Parker Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff |
Not filed as of 11/05/2026 | None yet |
What the pattern shows
Two different judges drew the 2 assigned Strike 3 Holdings Tennessee cases. Judge Sheryl H. Lipman and Judge Thomas L. Parker each have one case.
Magistrate judges referred so far: Magistrate Judge Annie T. Christoff, Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham. In many districts the magistrate judge is the one who rules on an early subpoena request.
As of November 5, 2026, none of the dockets has a motion asking to subpoena the internet provider yet, so no order and no order conditions exist so far.
That is normal this early in a case. The next step is usually a motion for leave to serve a subpoena on the provider before the discovery conference. Once a judge rules, the order sets the conditions the provider and Strike 3 Holdings must follow, such as limiting the request to a name and address and setting a notice period. Because each judge writes their own order, the conditions can differ from case to case. You can see earlier Tennessee Strike 3 Holdings coverage on our Strike 3 Holdings Tennessee lawsuits trends page.
What this means if you are the John Doe
- No letter has gone out yet in these cases. A provider letter normally follows a court order, and none of these Strike 3 Holdings Tennessee cases has one so far.
- The letter will name the case. When it arrives, it should list the court, the docket number, and the IP address. Compare them with the table above.
- The letter sets your timeline. The date in your provider’s letter is the date to plan around.
- Your name is not in the public case. At this stage each case lists only an IP address.
What you Can Learn
Our short videos explain some of the important things to know about the Strike 3 Holdings lawsuit process, and your main options right now.
Many clients have told us our videos are very helpful. Click the image below to watch.
What usually happens next in Strike 3 Holdings Tennessee cases
- Strike 3 Holdings files a John Doe complaint identified only by an IP address. That step is done in all 2 cases.
- It asks the court for permission to subpoena the internet provider before the usual discovery conference. As of November 5, 2026, we have not seen that request filed in any of these cases.
- If the court agrees, the provider notifies the account holder. That is the letter most people receive.
- After the notice period in the court order, the provider may release the account holder’s name and address unless something is filed.
Use the dates in your own letter. Timelines in Strike 3 Holdings Tennessee cases depend on the judge and on the terms of each order. In these Strike 3 Holdings Tennessee cases, the internet provider listed is Comcast Cable (2 cases). That provider would send the subpoena letter for those cases. Our ISP letter guide explains what the letter means.
Clients we have represented in Tennessee
Antonelli Law® has represented about 20 clients who live in Tennessee in federal copyright matters since 2015. We handle Strike 3 Holdings Tennessee matters by phone, email, and secure upload through our contact page, so you do not need to travel to Memphis to talk with us.
Our Tennessee clients have lived in Alcoa, Brentwood, Chattanooga, Greeneville, Hendersonville, Hermitage, Johnson City, Memphis, Murfreesboro, Nashville, Old Hickory, and Somerville.
Attorney Highlight: Jeffrey Antonelli
Jeffrey Antonelli founded Antonelli Law® in Chicago in 2007 and still leads its BitTorrent Copyright Defense Group, along with its Drone/UAS Practice Group. He has spent nearly 25 years as a civil litigator in state and federal court, on both the plaintiff and defense side, for individuals and corporations alike. Earlier in his career he worked at several Chicago Loop litigation boutiques and a full-service firm, on software, data center contracts, business, insurance and consumer fraud disputes.
He belongs to the trial bar of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and is admitted in many other federal courts nationwide. Jeffrey studied philosophy at Loyola University Chicago, then earned his law degree, with a health law certificate, at DePaul. Outlets including The New York Times, NBC, Bloomberg BNA, the Chicago Tribune, Chicago Lawyer and the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin have interviewed him.
Phone: (312) 201-8310. Email: Jeffrey@Antonelli-Law.com.
Clients Appreciate Our Communication & Results
Here is just one client review of Jeffrey Antonelli. Click the link below for many others.
Posted by John | August 05, 2026 | Hired Attorney
great experience with Antonelli
“I hired Jeffrey Antonelli for a copyright infringement issue (Strike3) in Massachusetts. It was a very good decision. He has dealt with many such cases and immediately put me at ease. He ended up negotiating a settlement that was much less than what I told him was my limit. He understood my privacy concerns and ensured that my name stayed out of any communication with opposing counsel, court filings etc. The whole issue was wrapped up within 3 weeks. He charges a non-negligible fee, but it is 100% worth it if you want to settle quickly and quietly and move on.”
Got an ISP letter about a Strike 3 Holdings Tennessee case?
Most people we talk with want a quiet, anonymous resolution. We also defend cases in court when that is the better path. The first step is simply a free, confidential consultation about your letter and the documents in your case.
Call or tap: (312) 201-8310
Or email or upload your documents through our contact page, or choose an attorney and book a time below.
Schedule Your Free Confidential Strike 3 Holdings Consultation
Speak directly with our team. Choose the attorney you prefer. A consultation is not a decision to go to court.
Jeffrey Antonelli
Alec Dardis
Paul Sanders
Melissa Ross
Frequently asked questions
Do I need a Tennessee lawyer for a Strike 3 Holdings case?
No. Strike 3 Holdings Tennessee cases are federal copyright cases. Antonelli Law® handles Strike 3 Holdings matters in federal courts nationwide, and you can work with us by phone, email, and upload.
Which courthouse is my case in?
Look at the first digit of the docket number on your letter or court order. In the Western District of Tennessee, 2: is Memphis.
Will my name be public?
At the subpoena stage the case usually lists only an IP address. Many people resolve these matters confidentially through counsel, often without their name appearing in the public record.
What if I did not download anything?
The person who pays for the internet account is not always the person who used it. That difference can matter a great deal, and it is worth discussing in a free, confidential consultation before you respond to anyone.
Related reading
- Strike 3 Holdings ISP letter guide
- Strike 3 Holdings ISP notices
- Strike 3 Holdings FAQ
- Strike 3 Holdings Tennessee lawsuits trends
This page is general information about Strike 3 Holdings and similar BitTorrent copyright cases. It is not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every case is different. Client reviews describe individual experiences. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Antonelli Law® defends people and businesses against copyright claims and does not represent copyright holders. Attorney advertising. Information is current as of November 5, 2026.
TORRENT DEFENDERS® is a federally registered trademark owned exclusively by the Law Offices of Jeffrey J. Antonelli, Ltd. dba Antonelli Law®.
How To Resolve a Florida Strike 3 Holdings case
Arizona Internet Users Receive ME2 Productions Lawsuit Letters & Settlement Demands
Are Malibu Media and Strike 3 Holdings Reaching Their Limit with Judges?
About Author
JAntonelli
Jeffrey Antonelli is a member of the federal trial bar of the Northern District of Illinois and is admitted to numerous federal courts around the country. He has been a civil litigator nearly 25 years in a broad range of actions representing corporations and individuals as plaintiffs and defendants in state and federal court. Jeffrey has been interviewed by the media many times, including Bloomberg BNA, NBC, The New York Times, Chicago Lawyer, Chicago Tribune, and the longstanding lawyer’s publication Chicago Daily Law Bulletin. Prior to forming Antonelli Law Ltd. in 2007 Jeffrey worked for several litigation boutiques in Chicago’s Loop as well as a full service firm. His litigation experience includes hotly contested issues in intellectual property, business, insurance, and consumer fraud. He is an adviser to the Illinois Board of Higher Education Advisory Council for Private Business and Vocational Schools (PBVS), and was a member of the Illinois State Bar Association Education Law Section Council from 2012-2013. Jeffrey is especially proud of his work representing hundreds of students defrauded by improperly accredited educational institutions, including as certified class counsel. Before attending law school, Jeffrey was interested first in business, and then in biomedical ethics. These interests led him to graduate from the nation’s largest philosophy department at Loyola University in Chicago, where some of his favorite (and most challenging) subjects were cognitive science and philosophy of science. During college he held positions at the University of Chicago’s Ben May Institute; as a medical assistant for a University of Chicago foot and ankle surgeon; and volunteered in the emergency room at the University of Chicago Hospitals. These experiences led to studying health law at the DePaul College of Law where Jeffrey earned his law degree and a certificate in health law. At that time DePaul’s Institute for Health Law was consistently ranked in the top 10 health law specialty programs nationwide. During law school Jeffrey immersed himself in studying the practical and public policy aspects of health care through internships at the American Medical Association in Chicago, and on Capitol Hill at the Governmental Relations Office of the Association of American Medical Colleges in Washington, DC. Jeffrey has concentrated in civil litigation throughout his legal career, and is a member of the federal trial bar of the Northern District of Illinois, the Central District of Illinois federal court, and all federal courts of Colorado, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Indiana. In addition, he is a member of the DuPage County Bar Association and the Illinois State Bar Association. Jeffrey prides himself on his strong personal ideals, passionate, ethical advocacy, and working hard to bring the best possible results for his clients. He also maintains a special interest in cases involving fraud. Whether due to good parenting, his family’s law enforcement employment, undergraduate studies in philosophy including ethics, or a fortuitous outcome of good breeding, one essence of Jeffrey’s character is a drive to root out the truth behind fraudulent practices.