LHF Productions, Inc. to Ask Illinois Judges to Allow Comcast ISP Subpoenas

Share

In late June 2016, LHF Productions filed 12 new copyright lawsuits in the Northern District Court of Illinois against 315 defendants with each defendant being an unnamed “Doe.”

On July 19 and 20th 2016, LHF Productions, Inc. filed motions before ten federal judges in the Northern District of Illinois requesting permission to issue subpoenas to Comcast Cable to reveal the identities of internet subscribers who allegedly downloaded the movie “London Has Fallen” without permission using BitTorrent.

On July 20th, Northern District of Illinois federal judge Andrea Wood granted the request of LHF Productions, Inc. to issue subpoenas to Comcast Cable to reveal the names of Illinois internet subscribers who allegedly downloaded the movie “London Has Fallen.” Click here for the Order allowing ISP subpoenas issued by judge Andrea Wood in LHF Productions Inc v Does 1- 19 16-cv-06800.

If you are the account holder for an internet service provider (ISP), your name is linked to an IP address. If you receive an ISP letter informing you a subpoena was received to reveal your identity, click here to learn about motions to quash or call Antonelli Law of Chicago at 312-201-8310 or use the contact form below.

[contact-form-7 id=”10″ title=”Case Contact”]

The motions before judge Sarah Ellis will be heard on Wednesday, July 27th at 9:45 in court room 1403, unless the judge takes action on the motion prior to that date. Click here for the motion for leave to issue Comcast subpoenas in case number 16-cv-6796 LHF Productions, Inc. v Does 1-25. Click here for the motion for leave to issue Comcast subpoenas in case number 16-cv-6798 LHF Productions, Inc. v Does 1-24 .

The motion before judge Samuel Der-Yeghiayan will be heard on Wednesday, July 27th at 9:00 in court room 1903, unless the judge takes action on the motion prior to that date. Click here for the motion for leave to issue Comcast subpoenas in case number 16-6796 LHF Productions, Inc. v Does 1-25.

The motions before judge Manish S. Shah will be heard on August 3rd at 9:45 AM in court room 1719, unless the judge takes action on the motion prior to that date. Click here for the motion for leave to issue Comcast subpoenas in case number 16-cv-06799 LHF Productions, Inc. v Does 1-24. Click here for the motion for leave to issue Comcast subpoenas in case number 16-cv-06808 LHF Productions, Inc. v Does 1-30.

The motion before judge James Zagel will be heard on August 2nd at 9:30 AM in court room 2503, unless the judge takes action on the motion prior to that date. Click here for the motion for leave to issue Comcast subpoenas in case number 16-cv-06801 LHF Productions, Inc. v Does 1-18.

The motion before judge John Lee will be heard on August 4th at 9:00 AM in court room 1225, unless the judge takes action on the motion prior to that date. Click here for the motion for leave to issue Comcast subpoenas in case number 16-cv-06802 LHF Productions, Inc. v Does 1-30.

The motion before judge Milton Shadur will be heard on July 26 2016 at 9:15 AM in court room 2303, unless the judge takes action on the motion prior to that date. Click here for the motion for leave to issue Comcast subpoenas in case number 16-cv-06803 LHF Productions, Inc. v Does 1-31.

The motion before judge Amy St. Eve will be heard on August 9 2016 at 8:30 AM in court room 1241, unless the judge takes action on the motion prior to that date. Click here for the motion for leave to issue Comcast subpoenas in case number 16-cv-06805 LHF Productions, Inc. v Does 1-29.

The motion before judge Joan Gottschall will be heard on July 29th 2016 at 11:00 AM in court room 2325, unless the judge takes action on the motion prior to that date. Click here for the motion for leave to issue Comcast subpoenas in case number 16-cv-06806 LHF Productions, Inc. v Does 1-29.

The motion before judge Sharon Johnson Coleman will be heard on July 27th 2016 at 8:45 AM in court room 1425 unless the judge takes action on the motion prior to that date. Click here for the motion for leave to issue Comcast subpoenas in case number 16-cv-06811 LHF Productions, Inc. v Does 1-22.

The LHF Productions, Inc. lawsuits in the Northern District of Illinois will not proceed unless the motions are granted.

If the motions are granted, Comcast subscribers living in Aurora, Berwyn, Bolingbrook, Carpentersville, Chicago, Bridgeview, Des Plaines, Forest Park, Lansing, Melrose Park, Mount Prospect, Oak Park, Oswego, Rockford, Round Lake, Sycamore, Waukegan, Wheaton, Wheeling, and Wilmette will receive letters from Comcast informing them that court a subpoena was received to reveal their identity and that they have the opportunity to file a motion to quash the subpoena to try to prevent their identity being released to LHF Productions, Inc.’s attorneys.

If you are the account holder for an internet service provider (ISP), your name is linked to an IP address. If you receive an ISP letter informing you a subpoena was received to reveal your identity, click here to learn about motions to quash or call us at 312-201-8310 or use the contact form below.

[contact-form-7 id=”10″ title=”Case Contact”]

Attorney Jeffrey Antonelli is admitted to the trial bar of the Northern District of Illinois federal court as well as numerous federal courts around the country.  Antonelli Law has represented defendants accused by LHF Productions living in Hawaii, Arizona, and Illinois of using BitTorrent file-sharing software to illegally download the movie “London Has Fallen” and over 1,100 defendants from California to New York in many BitTorrent copyright infringement lawsuits in federal court. Attorneys: Don’t risk malpractice in a copyright lawsuit where the  loser pays statutory and attorneys fees. We accept attorney referrals and are very experienced in this specialized litigation.

Jeffrey Antonelli has been recognized by national and local media as representing many people accused of BitTorrent file-sharing of copyrighted work, including by Bloomberg BNA.

Northern District of Illinois
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-06796
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-06797
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 16-cv-06798
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 16-cv-06799
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-19 16-cv-06800
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-18 16-cv-06801
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-30 16-cv-06802
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-31 16-cv-06803
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-06805
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-06806
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-39 16-cv-06808
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-22 16-cv-06811
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-30 16-cv-04730
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-27 16-cv-04731
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-04732
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-19 16-cv-04733
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-04734
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-23 16-cv-04740
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-04741
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-28 16-cv-04742
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-04743
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 16-cv-04744
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 16-cv-03903
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 16-cv-03904
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 16-cv-03892
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-21 16-cv-03902
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-03896
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 16-cv-03899
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-27 16-cv-03907
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-27 16-cv-03897
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-31 16-cv-03905
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-03887

Share
One Comment

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Website Apps