More Virginians Targeted by LHF Productions Inc Lawsuit in Virginia

Share

Last month we reported that more than 100 Virginians would soon be served with summons and complaint by the producers of the movie “London Has Fallen” according to federal court records.

In these LHF Productions Virginia lawsuits, it alleges defendants in Alexandria, Arlington, Ashburn,Chantilly, Colonial Heights, Gainseville, Petersburg, Chester, Richmond, Stafford, Glen Allen, Woodbridge, Fredericksburg,Manassass, Petersburg, Richmond, Powhatan, Prince George, Purcellville, Stafford, and Warrenton downloaded the file named  London.Has.Fallen.2016.CAM-DiNGO with Hash SHAl: 696324E2794A33ABES.3 and others to obtain an illegal copy of the movie.

The federal lawsuits, filed back in May 2016 by LHF Productions Inc.  accused 122 Comcast users in Virginia of downloading the movie “London Has Fallen” using BitTorrent software to illegally download the movie “London Has Fallen” for free.

And more recently, on September 9th, LHF Productions Inc. sued another 10 Virginians. That case is LHF Productions Inc. v. Does 1-10 16-cv-00748-MHL  in the Eastern District of Virginia.

Our Virginia local counsel Peter Glazer will help us solve your LHF Productions Inc. Virginia lawsuit in the most efficient, cost-effective manner for you. If you are served with a LHF Productions Virginia lawsuit Summons and Complaint, you will have 21 days to file a responsive pleading with the Court.

Call Antonelli Law at 312-201-8310 for a free attorney consultation about your legal options. Paired with our tremendous experience defending BitTorrent copyright infringement lawsuits around the country we look forward to assisting Virginians on the wrong side of a LHF Productions Inc. and lawsuit.

CONTACT ANTONELLI LAW FOR A FREE CONSULTATION

[contact-form-7 id=”10″ title=”Case Contact”]

Virginia copyright defense attorney Peter Glazer
Virginia copyright defense attorney Peter Glazer

Previously, the Court allowed LHF Productions Inc. to issue subpoenas to the internet providers of each Defendant in order to learn the identity of each person, previously only known by an IP address. Oftentimes, settlement demand letters are then sent by the lawyers representing LHF Productions Inc. to these internet subscribers. We do not know if such letters were actually sent in this case, however  a review of federal court records do not show any stipulated dismissals pursuant to settlement.

Attorneys: Don’t risk malpractice in a copyright lawsuit where the  loser pays statutory and attorneys fees. We accept attorney referrals and are very experienced in this specialized litigation.

LHF Productions Inc. v. Does 1-10 16-cv-00748-MHL 

LHF Productions Inc. v. Does 1-18

LHF Productions Inc. v. Does 1-24

LHF Productions Inc. v. Does 1-25

LHF Productions Inc. v. Does 1-20

LHF Productions Inc. v. Does 1-25

Order denying MTW Def Julie Henegar WDVA

Note: If you are receive a letter from Comcast or your internet service provider informing you of the copyright infringement allegation of LHF Productions Inc. and your legal right to file a motion to quash or vacate the subpoena, call Antonelli Law at 312-201-8310 and we will explain each of your legal options.

The clients used in one of the above LHF Productions Virginia lawsuit were Azureus 5.7.1, uTorrent 3.4.0, BitTorrent 7.9.5, TuoTu 1.5.5, BltComet 0.1.3, and others

CONTACT ANTONELLI LAW FOR A FREE CONSULTATION

Our firm defends clients nationwide in federal copyright infringement matters.

LHF Productions Inc. is represented in Virginia by attorney Dale R. Jensen of Dale Jensen, PLC, 606 Bull Run, Staunton, VA 24401

LHF Productions Inc Virginia Complaint 16-cv-00284

Share

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Website Apps