Are you wondering why a company called Strike 3 Holdings LLC is suing you? Strike 3 Holdings has been filing copyright infringement cases on a federal level for years. However, they recently focused their efforts on the Florida State Court. The filings that occur in Florida have been criticized as a violation of Florida’s “pure bill of discovery”.
If you are still being accused of downloading adult content illegally by Strike 3 Holdings, we are here to assist. In the US, copyright infringement cases are a federal matter and should be handled in federal court. However, you are still being accused of illegally downloading adult content produced by Strike 3 Holdings.
This is how we’ve seen these cases unfold: For Strike 3 Holdings cases filed in Florida State Court, if the ISP Subscriber does not act proactively once they receive the ISP notice by settling the case out of court or by filing a motion to quash, Strike 3’s attorneys are sending out letters informing the ISP Subscriber of their intent to sue the ISP Subscriber in federal court.
It’s important to note that Antonelli Law has been involved in several of these Strike 3 Florida State court cases. Antonelli Law has had lawsuits dismissed through successful motions to quash.
Strike 3 Holdings Motion To Quash
While the motion to quash works for some of these cases with Strike 3 Holdings, there are certain drawbacks that you will want to discuss with your attorney.
We have seen cases where a defendant files a motion to quash and won their case only to be sued once again in federal court. Please make sure you discuss all the possible outcomes with your team before moving forward.
Antonelli Law can help you anonymously settle your case with Strike 3 Holdings and will be sure to fight to protect your anonymity. We will also work to aggressively negotiate your settlement amount. These cases are time-sensitive, and whether your case was filed federally or in state court, we can help.
At Antonelli Law, we will discuss if settling your case anonymously, filing a motion to quash, or fighting in court is the best option for you. We can discuss this in our free consultation as we will aim to work as quickly as possible to resolve your unique case.
It is vital to note that this is a real subpoena. This is not a scam. You are being sued for copyright infringement by Strike 3 Holdings LLC.
Right now, it is possible that the court only knows you as John Doe, depending on your case circumstances. If you ignore the subpoena, your internet service provider will likely release your name to Strike 3 Holdings LLC’s lawyers.
In almost all cases, they will amend the complaint name in the public court documents from ‘John Doe’ to your name once Strike 3 Holdings has your name. You will then be served with a court summons.
Under no circumstances should someone ever ignore a court summons.
Many clients don’t mind losing their anonymity, but the downside to ignoring your Strike 3 Holdings subpoena and receiving a summons is that your options moving forward are limited and you’ll lose some of your negotiating power.
Strike 3 Holdings cases can be difficult to navigate, contact Antonelli Law for a free confidential consultation and receive assistance today.
Share! Save Someone From Being Sued
Related
About Author
JAntonelli
Jeffrey Antonelli is a member of the federal trial bar of the Northern District of Illinois and is admitted to numerous federal courts around the country. He has been a civil litigator nearly 25 years in a broad range of actions representing corporations and individuals as plaintiffs and defendants in state and federal court.
Jeffrey has been interviewed by the media many times, including Bloomberg BNA, NBC, The New York Times, Chicago Lawyer, Chicago Tribune, and the longstanding lawyer’s publication Chicago Daily Law Bulletin.
Prior to forming Antonelli Law Ltd. in 2007 Jeffrey worked for several litigation boutiques in Chicago’s Loop as well as a full service firm. His litigation experience includes hotly contested issues in intellectual property, business, insurance, and consumer fraud. He is an adviser to the Illinois Board of Higher Education Advisory Council for Private Business and Vocational Schools (PBVS), and was a member of the Illinois State Bar Association Education Law Section Council from 2012-2013. Jeffrey is especially proud of his work representing hundreds of students defrauded by improperly accredited educational institutions, including as certified class counsel.
Before attending law school, Jeffrey was interested first in business, and then in biomedical ethics. These interests led him to graduate from the nation’s largest philosophy department at Loyola University in Chicago, where some of his favorite (and most challenging) subjects were cognitive science and philosophy of science. During college he held positions at the University of Chicago’s Ben May Institute; as a medical assistant for a University of Chicago foot and ankle surgeon; and volunteered in the emergency room at the University of Chicago Hospitals. These experiences led to studying health law at the DePaul College of Law where Jeffrey earned his law degree and a certificate in health law. At that time DePaul’s Institute for Health Law was consistently ranked in the top 10 health law specialty programs nationwide.
During law school Jeffrey immersed himself in studying the practical and public policy aspects of health care through internships at the American Medical Association in Chicago, and on Capitol Hill at the Governmental Relations Office of the Association of American Medical Colleges in Washington, DC.
Jeffrey has concentrated in civil litigation throughout his legal career, and is a member of the federal trial bar of the Northern District of Illinois, the Central District of Illinois federal court, and all federal courts of Colorado, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Indiana. In addition, he is a member of the DuPage County Bar Association and the Illinois State Bar Association.
Jeffrey prides himself on his strong personal ideals, passionate, ethical advocacy, and working hard to bring the best possible results for his clients. He also maintains a special interest in cases involving fraud. Whether due to good parenting, his family’s law enforcement employment, undergraduate studies in philosophy including ethics, or a fortuitous outcome of good breeding, one essence of Jeffrey’s character is a drive to root out the truth behind fraudulent practices.