Malibu Media Subpoena: Why you were targeted and what to expect next
This is a blog dedicated to updates on copyright infringement cases. We have handled more than 900 Malibu Media cases over the past seven years, helping each client figure out the best option for their individual situation. We can represent you in your case against Malibu Media. For more information about your subpoena visit our main website’s Malibu Media page.
Malibu Media LLC produces pornographic films and distributes it through the website x-art.com.
Why did I receive a subpoena from Malibu Media?
If you’ve received a subpoena, Malibu Media is accusing someone at your IP address of illegally downloading their adult films.
Your first notice of the lawsuit will probably be a notification letter from your internet service provider and a subpoena from Malibu Media alleging that your IP address was used to download their content online without the proper licensing fees.
How did Malibu Media get my address?
Using a variety of methods, Malibu Media was allegedly able to track the illegal downloads to your IP address. Armed with an IP address Malibu Media was able to ascertain who your internet service provider (ISP) is.
With these two bits of information, Malibu Media filed a federal lawsuit for copyright infringement and asked a judge for permission to send a subpoena to your ISP to reveal your name and address.
At this point, you are still anonymous and identified as ‘John Doe’. Now that your ISP has sent you a notification and a copy of the subpoena, you need to decide how you want to handle the case. Typically, you have 30 days or less from the time you receive this notification.
What happens if I ignore the notification from my ISP?
If you choose to ignore your subpoena, your internet service provider will likely release your name to Malibu Media’s lawyers. If Malibu Media receives your name, in almost all cases they will quickly amend the complaint name in the public court documents from ‘John Doe’ to your name—and then you will be served with a court summons.
Some clients don’t mind losing their anonymity, but your options on how to handle your Malibu Media case will be limited after ignoring the subpoena and being served with a summons.
Under no circumstances should you ignore a summons.
What are my other options for handling my Malibu Media subpoena?
First, here are the things you shouldn’t do:
- Don’t sign anything
- Don’t try to delete anything – this could make penalties worse
Next, you need to decide how you want to handle your Malibu Media subpoena. The longer you wait, the fewer options you’ll have.
You have three options:
- You can anonymously resolve the case through settlement
- You can file a motion to quash
- You can fight back in court
What are the pros and cons of each option?
Settling with Malibu Media
A settlement buys you peace of mind and, if you settle through Antonelli Law, the ability to settle and make payment anonymously. However, this means you will pay a settlement regardless of whether or not you believe you should have to. Many clients feel that the ability to ensure their anonymity and ending the process is worth the settlement.
If you settle through Antonelli Law, we ensure you are completely protected, even if the settlement is an anonymous one.
Pros:
- The case is resolved quickly
- The case is resolved anonymously from public records and, at times, is anonymous from the movie company and its attorneys as well
- We’ll ensure you (not just your IP address) are released so you can’t be sued again for other supposed download activity that happened prior to the settlement
Cons:
- You have to pay a settlement fee regardless of whether or not you think you’re responsible
Filing a Motion to Quash
We do file motions to quash and believe they can work in certain limited circumstances, but it is a risk.
While this may seem the best option on the surface, even if you win a motion to quash the subpoena, the movie company will probably have the right to file an amended lawsuit against you. If they do file an amended lawsuit, a second motion to quash may need to be filed. The judge may or may not throw the case out of court, and it is possible the movie company may appeal the decision to the appellate court.
Each case is unique, and Antonelli Law has been successful with multiple motions to quash and can provide advice on your particular case.
Pros:
- The case could be thrown out for multiple reasons
- The movie company could be exposed if it was engaged in some kind of technical chicanery or unethical practices, and the case could crumble
Cons:
- You may still get sued
- You may lose your anonymity if you the motion is denied
Fight Back in Court
If this is the right choice for you, we are tenacious, experienced litigators who can help fight back vigorously in any federal court across the country.
Pros:
- You could win the case and get damages, including legal fees
Cons:
- You could lose the case and owe much more than the original settlement fee
- You could lose your anonymity
If you’re ready to speak to an ISP Subpoena Defense specialist about your Malibu Media LLC subpoena, contact us today at 312-201-8310 to set up your free consultation.
Related
Related Posts
Malibu Media LLC Sues Internet Users in Pennsylvania – Information and Help From Antonelli Law
Strike 3 Holdings: Updates from Pennsylvania
Strike 3 Holdings Files More Cases
About Author
JAntonelli
Jeffrey Antonelli is a member of the federal trial bar of the Northern District of Illinois and is admitted to numerous federal courts around the country. He has been a civil litigator nearly 25 years in a broad range of actions representing corporations and individuals as plaintiffs and defendants in state and federal court. Jeffrey has been interviewed by the media many times, including Bloomberg BNA, NBC, The New York Times, Chicago Lawyer, Chicago Tribune, and the longstanding lawyer’s publication Chicago Daily Law Bulletin. Prior to forming Antonelli Law Ltd. in 2007 Jeffrey worked for several litigation boutiques in Chicago’s Loop as well as a full service firm. His litigation experience includes hotly contested issues in intellectual property, business, insurance, and consumer fraud. He is an adviser to the Illinois Board of Higher Education Advisory Council for Private Business and Vocational Schools (PBVS), and was a member of the Illinois State Bar Association Education Law Section Council from 2012-2013. Jeffrey is especially proud of his work representing hundreds of students defrauded by improperly accredited educational institutions, including as certified class counsel. Before attending law school, Jeffrey was interested first in business, and then in biomedical ethics. These interests led him to graduate from the nation’s largest philosophy department at Loyola University in Chicago, where some of his favorite (and most challenging) subjects were cognitive science and philosophy of science. During college he held positions at the University of Chicago’s Ben May Institute; as a medical assistant for a University of Chicago foot and ankle surgeon; and volunteered in the emergency room at the University of Chicago Hospitals. These experiences led to studying health law at the DePaul College of Law where Jeffrey earned his law degree and a certificate in health law. At that time DePaul’s Institute for Health Law was consistently ranked in the top 10 health law specialty programs nationwide. During law school Jeffrey immersed himself in studying the practical and public policy aspects of health care through internships at the American Medical Association in Chicago, and on Capitol Hill at the Governmental Relations Office of the Association of American Medical Colleges in Washington, DC. Jeffrey has concentrated in civil litigation throughout his legal career, and is a member of the federal trial bar of the Northern District of Illinois, the Central District of Illinois federal court, and all federal courts of Colorado, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Indiana. In addition, he is a member of the DuPage County Bar Association and the Illinois State Bar Association. Jeffrey prides himself on his strong personal ideals, passionate, ethical advocacy, and working hard to bring the best possible results for his clients. He also maintains a special interest in cases involving fraud. Whether due to good parenting, his family’s law enforcement employment, undergraduate studies in philosophy including ethics, or a fortuitous outcome of good breeding, one essence of Jeffrey’s character is a drive to root out the truth behind fraudulent practices.

