New Strike 3 Holdings Lawsuits in Eastern District of California: Magistrate Judge Delaney Issues Strong Privacy Protections — But Defendants Should Proceed with Extreme Caution at Any Informal Conference

By Attorney Jeffrey Antonelli, Antonelli Law | June 2026

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC has filed another wave of “John Doe” copyright lawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. These cases target individuals identified only by IP address, alleging illegal downloading and distribution of adult films via BitTorrent.

Key Protective Provisions in Judge Delaney’s Orders

These orders contain important safeguards, including:

• Plaintiff is expressly cautioned that it may not reveal the defendant’s identity in or out of court without permission.
• The subpoena to the ISP is limited to name and address only.
• Attendance at any informal conference is voluntary and does not automatically constitute an appearance or waiver of service.

Most importantly, the orders explicitly state:

“Nothing in this order precludes plaintiff and defendant from reaching a settlement without court participation before any informal conference is held or formal service of process is effectuated.”

Important Warning for Anyone Considering an Informal Conference with Magistrate Judge Delaney

While these orders contain valuable protections, we strongly advise anyone who receives an ISP subpoena notice in these cases to think very carefully before voluntarily attending an informal conference with Magistrate Judge Delaney.

The order itself makes clear that one of the stated purposes of the conference is “To establish procedures for service of process or waiver thereof.”

During a voluntary conference, you may be asked — possibly with the plaintiff’s attorney present — whether you will waive service of process. More importantly, the order allows the case to be “resolved and a settlement placed on the record” during the conference. If you attend without your own attorney, you could face significant pressure to agree to a settlement on the spot.

Our strong recommendation: Hire an experienced federal copyright defense attorney first. Do not attend unrepresented. Have your own lawyer review any waiver of service and prepare any settlement agreement on your behalf.

Cases Covered by These Protective Orders

Cases Assigned to District Judge William B. Shubb (with Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney)

Filed April 23, 2026:

• 2:26-cv-01606-WBS-CKD – IP address 67.181.54.102
• 2:26-cv-01607-WBS-CKD – IP address 24.7.183.86
• 2:26-cv-01608-WBS-CKD – IP address 107.206.169.178
• 2:26-cv-01609-WBS-CKD – IP address 76.223.248.142
• 2:26-cv-01610-WBS-CKD – IP address 104.220.160.252

Filed May 22, 2026:

• 2:26-cv-01915-WBS-CKD – IP address 67.182.83.245
• 2:26-cv-01919-WBS-CKD – IP address 69.107.151.78
• 2:26-cv-01922-WBS-CKD – IP address 98.238.196.129
• 2:26-cv-01923-WBS-CKD – IP address 76.158.70.214

Cases Assigned to District Judge John A. Mendez (with Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney)

Filed April 23, 2026:

• 2:26-cv-01611-JAM-CKD – IP address 104.49.218.175

Filed May 22, 2026:

• 2:26-cv-01913-JAM-CKD – IP address 98.255.238.206
• 2:26-cv-01914-JAM-CKD – IP address 98.36.142.190
• 2:26-cv-01920-JAM-CKD – IP address 73.116.117.107
• 2:26-cv-01921-JAM-CKD – IP address 73.90.46.124
• 2:26-cv-01924-JAM-CKD – IP address 98.224.16.24
• 2:26-cv-01925-JAM-CKD – IP address 76.149.71.249
• 2:26-cv-01926-JAM-CKD – IP address 67.182.43.14

What Our Clients Say

“Mr. Jeff’s firm handled the case efficiently and with an ease and poise which is something very hard to see with most law firms today. He as well as his firm were well-versed with the past precedents of such cases and he talked to me and my son with a clear confidence and assurance… he efficiently interacted with the plaintiff’s law firm to correctly work towards the negotiation of the amount to pay… I have nothing but accolades to offer him and his firm!” — Karthik, May 25, 2026 (Avvo)

“Jeffrey Antonelli is very experienced with Strike 3 Holdings LLC copyright cases. The case was dismissed and I’m very happy with the end result.” — Client, March 13, 2026 (Avvo)

Antonelli Law — Here to Protect You

At Antonelli Law, we have successfully helped over 500 Californians resolve Strike 3 Holdings cases while protecting their privacy and reputation. We are very familiar with Magistrate Judge Delaney’s orders in both Shubb and Mendez cases.

You do not have to attend any conference alone. You do not have to waive service without advice. And you do not have to let Strike 3 pressure you into an unfavorable settlement.

Take the next step today:

• Call us confidentially right now at (312) 201-8310
• Or book a free appointment online with one of our experienced copyright defense attorneys: Schedule Your Free Consultation

Protect your privacy. Protect your reputation. Get experienced counsel on your side.

What Real Clients Say About Our Team

Jeffrey Antonelli

“I recently received a notice of Subpoena from my ISP alleging copyright infringement from Strike 3 Holdings. Jeff took the time to explain my options… He did not pressure me… The case settled in a few weeks for an amount a good bit lower even than the estimate Jeff had initially given me. I am so glad I chose this firm.”

→ View original review on Avvo

Book a Free Consultation with Jeffrey Antonelli

Alec Van Dardis

“I am deeply grateful to Mr. Alec Dardis for his legal services as my attorney concerning a Strike 3 Holdings LLC copyright case. Mr. Dardis communicated clearly and regularly with me throughout the process. He gave sound legal advice and gained my trust from the beginning. I highly recommend Mr. Dardis as an attorney in such cases.”

→ View original review on Avvo

Book a Free Consultation with Alec Van Dardis

Paul Sanders

“Attorney Sanders was great! He was professional, extremely knowledgeable, and was very forthcoming… He let me know what to expect and gave me potential realistic outcomes.”

→ View original review on Avvo

Book a Free Consultation with Paul Sanders

Melissa Ross

“Melissa from Antonelli Law came through for me. She was patient with me and made a tough confusing situation a lot less confusing and she helped me get the best resolution possible.”

→ View original review

Book a Free Consultation with Melissa Ross

Our Approach

At Torrent Defenders®, The BitTorrent Copyright Defense practice of Antonelli Law, we have always believed in legal excellence, excellent customer service, and ethical lawyering and business practices. We treat every client with dignity and transparency — never pressure tactics, never inflated promises, and never unnecessary fees.

Unfortunately, some newer competitors in this space continue to use fear-based tactics, telling people they face massive judgments and must retain “their” lawyer within 24 hours. We have never operated that way, and we never will.

What Should You Do If You Received a Notice?

If you received a Strike 3 Holdings ISP letter, here is what we recommend in the first 48 hours:

1. Do NOT ignore the letter — Deadlines are real and missing them can limit your options.
2. Document everything immediately (save the letter, note the date received, take screenshots).
3. Do NOT contact Strike 3 or their attorneys directly — Anything you say can be used against you.
4. Contact experienced counsel right away — The earlier we get involved, the more leverage and better outcomes we can typically achieve.
5. Know your rights and options — Most people overpay because they don’t know the full picture.

This post is for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every case is unique. Please consult qualified counsel about your specific situation.