Malibu Media Defendant Fights Back in Illinois Court
This is a blog dedicated to updates on copyright infringement cases. We have handled more than 900 Malibu Media cases over the past seven years, helping each client figure out the best option for their individual situation. We can represent you in your case against Malibu Media. For more information about your subpoena visit our main website’s Malibu Media page.
Malibu Media is suing Defendant, alleging they have distributed digital copies of its adult films using BitTorrent software, violating Malibu Media’s copyright.
Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that Malibu Media’s reliance on an IP address to identify him as a defendant is insufficient under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
According to casetext.com, on 4/12/19 the court ordered noted:
[Defendant] contends that Malibu Media has to do more than simply identify him as the registered subscriber of the suspected IP address in order to name him as a defendant, because others may have access to the IP address as well. For example, because he accesses the internet at home via a wifi router, he argues, it is possible that others—such as a roommate, the roommate’s friends, neighbors, a house/dog sitter, and anyone in a “sports field park” right across from his home—could have gained access to his internet account and downloaded the movies. Def.’s Mot. Dismiss at 1. Indeed, he claims that, for more than half of the dates identified, he was not at his home and was out of state.
[Defendant] makes other arguments as well. He contends that “[b]its and pieces are not movies,” and that Malibu Media has no evidence that he made copies. Id. at 1-2. [He] also argues that Malibu Media’s investigator operated without a license and used unreliable methods. And, finally, [he] claims that some of the infringement at issue occurred prior to registration of the copyrights at issue.
The court denied Defendant’s motion to dismiss Malibu Media’s complaint, noting:
Malibu Media has conducted a reasonable pre-suit investigation—it hired an investigator to track down the IP address responsible for infringement and issued a subpoena to the internet service provider to determine the subscriber of the IP address. See Mot. Leave File Am. Compl. at 1, ECF No. 15. The Court is well aware that individuals, other than [Defendant], may have had access to the internet using [Defendant’s] IP address. But short of staking out [Defendant’s] residence, it is unclear how Malibu Media could have obtained any further information concerning [Defendant’s] internet usage. And, given the security features commonly integrated into most wifi routers these days, it is plausible to infer that, as the registered subscriber of the IP address, [Defendant] was the person who accessed the internet using the IP address to download the movies in question. As to [Defendant’s] argument that it was not he who did it, that is a defense to the claim that is best left for discovery.
Accordingly, this Court is in accord with others that find identification of an IP address account holder sufficient to name a defendant for pleading purposes.
Have you received a Malibu Media LLC Subpoena?
Your next step is deciding how you want to handle your subpoena. We are an experienced internet service provider subpoena defense specialist firm that has represented over 900 Malibu Media defendants.
We work with clients nationwide. Click here to schedule your free consultation, or call us: 312-201-8310.
Related
Related Posts
Malibu Media LLC Files Big for 2018’s Third Quarter
Strike 3 Holdings – A Client’s View
Considering Settling with Malibu Media LLC?
About Author
JAntonelli
Jeffrey Antonelli is a member of the federal trial bar of the Northern District of Illinois and is admitted to numerous federal courts around the country. He has been a civil litigator nearly 25 years in a broad range of actions representing corporations and individuals as plaintiffs and defendants in state and federal court. Jeffrey has been interviewed by the media many times, including Bloomberg BNA, NBC, The New York Times, Chicago Lawyer, Chicago Tribune, and the longstanding lawyer’s publication Chicago Daily Law Bulletin. Prior to forming Antonelli Law Ltd. in 2007 Jeffrey worked for several litigation boutiques in Chicago’s Loop as well as a full service firm. His litigation experience includes hotly contested issues in intellectual property, business, insurance, and consumer fraud. He is an adviser to the Illinois Board of Higher Education Advisory Council for Private Business and Vocational Schools (PBVS), and was a member of the Illinois State Bar Association Education Law Section Council from 2012-2013. Jeffrey is especially proud of his work representing hundreds of students defrauded by improperly accredited educational institutions, including as certified class counsel. Before attending law school, Jeffrey was interested first in business, and then in biomedical ethics. These interests led him to graduate from the nation’s largest philosophy department at Loyola University in Chicago, where some of his favorite (and most challenging) subjects were cognitive science and philosophy of science. During college he held positions at the University of Chicago’s Ben May Institute; as a medical assistant for a University of Chicago foot and ankle surgeon; and volunteered in the emergency room at the University of Chicago Hospitals. These experiences led to studying health law at the DePaul College of Law where Jeffrey earned his law degree and a certificate in health law. At that time DePaul’s Institute for Health Law was consistently ranked in the top 10 health law specialty programs nationwide. During law school Jeffrey immersed himself in studying the practical and public policy aspects of health care through internships at the American Medical Association in Chicago, and on Capitol Hill at the Governmental Relations Office of the Association of American Medical Colleges in Washington, DC. Jeffrey has concentrated in civil litigation throughout his legal career, and is a member of the federal trial bar of the Northern District of Illinois, the Central District of Illinois federal court, and all federal courts of Colorado, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Indiana. In addition, he is a member of the DuPage County Bar Association and the Illinois State Bar Association. Jeffrey prides himself on his strong personal ideals, passionate, ethical advocacy, and working hard to bring the best possible results for his clients. He also maintains a special interest in cases involving fraud. Whether due to good parenting, his family’s law enforcement employment, undergraduate studies in philosophy including ethics, or a fortuitous outcome of good breeding, one essence of Jeffrey’s character is a drive to root out the truth behind fraudulent practices.

