Venice Pi LLC Movie Download Cases in Chicago: Judge Leinenweber Assigned to Most – ISP Subpoena Defense

Share

VENICE PI LLC , the movie company behind the BRUCE WILLIS movie “ONCE UPON A TIME IN VENICE” is suing Chicago area users for using computer file-sharing software to obtain its movie for free.

Did you receive a copyright infringement notice from your internet service provider (ISP), and a subpoena from VENICE PI LLC for the illegal download of the movie, “ONCE UPON A TIME IN VENICE’? Don’t panic, we’re here to help.

Much of what follows is relevant to people in any state facing a Venice Pi LLC subpoena or summons. But you can also click here and here to look for articles that pertain to Venice Pi LLC lawsuits filed in your state and others. Antonelli Law helps people nationwide, and we follow case developments on a national level.

The Honorable Judge Leinenweber is a respected senior federal judge, and Judge Leinenweber has been assigned to three of the five Venice Pi, LLC cases filed in the Northern District of Illinois. Judges Gary Feinerman and Thomas Durkin have been assigned one case each. All three judges have granted Venice Pi LLC’s requests to issue subpoenas to internet providers to reveal the names of Chicago land internet users accused of downloading the movie “Once Upon a Time in Venice” for free without paying for it. Several of these court orders can be found below.

Why Did I Receive a Subpoena from VENICE PI LLC?

The VENICE PI LLC subpoena probably relates to a federal copyright infringement lawsuit. Essentially, VENICE PI LLC is alleging that someone in the home or office illegally downloaded ONCE UPON A TIME IN VENICE produced using file-sharing software such as BitTorrent without paying a license fee.


Set up a free consultation to discuss the specifics of your case, or keep reading below for more information on what you can expect from your case with VENICE PI LLC.


What Do I Do?
Firstly and most importantly- don’t ignore it! You have a limited amount of time to decide what to do; the longer you leave it, the fewer choices you’ll have. Typically, you have anywhere from two weeks to one month after receiving the ISP letter and VENICE PI LLC subpoena to decide what to do.

Secondly, deleting anything could make the penalties worse, don’t try to hide anything.

Don’t Sign Anything Before Speaking with a Copyright Defense Attorney
If you receive a Waiver of Service of Summons form in the mail, don’t sign it before speaking with an experienced attorney. Signing the Waiver of Service of Summons form you received in the mail from the movie company’s lawyer will in some cases lead to an unfair default or consent judgments against you.

Speaking with an experienced attorney with a background in ISP subpoena defense can help you make informed decisions about how to process. Antonelli Law provides free copyright infringement consultations to those Chicago area users being sued by VENICE PI LLC.

If you want to read more about recent cases of ISP users in copyright infringement allegation lawsuits, consider this article by Jeffrey Antonelli about “copyright troll” litigation, published by the Illinois State Bar Association’s Intellectual Property Section. It speaks to our expertise in this field of litigation.

Once you’ve spoken to an experienced ISP Subpoena Defense Attorney, you’ll understand your specific case better, but generally, you have three options:

Chicagoland Defendants’ Options for the VENICE PI LLC Copyright Infringement Claims:
• Resolve the case anonymously
• File a motion to quash before it gets to court
• Prepare to fight your case in court

Antonelli Law knows how to help you figure out the best action for your subpoena defense and the VENICE PI LLC Copyright Infringement Claims. We’re the nation’s most experienced BT copyright defense firm, with a record of having helped nearly 2,000 people across the country accused of downloading movies over the internet in the types of lawsuits such as the one brought by VENICE PI LLC against Chicago area users over the movie “ONCE UPON A TIME IN VENICE”.

Contact us to see which option is best for your VENICE PI LLC case.

Resolving Your VENICE PI LLC Case Anonymously
The easiest and most common way to resolve your VENICE PI LLC case is out of court. Choosing this option allows you to settle anonymously. At Antonelli Law, we charge a flat legal fee of somewhere between $750 – $1,000 for anonymous settlements.

Filing a Motion to Quash the VENICE PI LLC Subpoena You Received
The motion to quash argues that the lawsuit’s complaints claiming copyright infringement only claim a few ‘bits’ of data were transmitted by the IP address and user in question, therefore they do not provide enough evidence to make a claim on copyright infringement, and the court should throw out the copyright infringement lawsuit brought by VENICE PI LLC due to deficiency, then the court should also quash the subpoena for the user in question. At Antonelli Law, we offer a flat rate for filing motions to quash a subpoena.

This option is not without risks. Contact Antonelli’s experienced ISP subpoena defense lawyers to discuss this option further.

Preparing to Fight Your VENICE PI LLC Case in Court
When choosing to fight a copyright infringement lawsuit brought against you by VENICE PI LLC, for the illegal downloading of the move “ONCE UPON A TIME IN VENICE”, Antonelli Law should be your first choice for defense.

We have local counsel coast to coast, to help us efficiently settle or fight lawsuits brought against our clients. We offer free consultations where we explain what you can expect when fighting this copyright infringement lawsuit from VENICE PI LLC in court. After that, we charge an hourly fee.

There are many defense standpoints from which we can tenaciously work to fight the copyright infringement lawsuit brought against Chicagoland users by VENICE PI LLC over the BRUCE WILLIS movie, “ONCE UPON A TIME IN VENICE”. One of the most common forms of defense is claiming that the user who transmitted the data for the movie “ONCE UPON A TIME IN VENICE” through a BitTorrent is not the user at this IP address.

This is a strong defense because the copyright infringement lawsuit brought against the defendant assumes that the defendant used their own IP address to transmit the data for the movie. However, hackers often disguise their IP addresses when illegally transmitting data online, so in many cases, the defendant is not at fault and did not commit copyright infringement by downloading “ONCE UPON A TIME IN VENICE” over a bit torrent.

Why Choose Antonelli Law as Your Experienced ISP Subpoena Defense Law Firm in ONCE UPON A TIME IN VENICE?

  • We offer fair and competitive prices. Because we concentrate in BitTorrent copyright infringement cases, we are able to provide competent, zealous defense services for a more reasonable fee than most law firms marketing themselves as “intellectual property” law firms. The reason is that BitTorrent copyright infringement litigation is different than most other litigation cases. A copyright lawyer who is not experienced with BitTorrent copyright cases will have to charge you for a good deal of research to get up to speed. Meanwhile, we are already “cooking with gas” and hit the ground running for you. Our flat fees and hourly fees for litigation in court are also far less than any large law firm having an intellectual property department. Finally, attorneys Jeffrey Antonelli and Melissa Brabender are both admitted to the federal district court in the Northern District of Illinois where these cases are filed. And attorney Jeffrey Antonelli is admitted to the trial bar of the Northern District of Illinois – a credential few if any of our competitors have
  • This area of law is fast paced and changes happen rapidly, so we are continuously following the latest developments in cases nationwide
  • We have years of experience representing ISP users accused of Bit Torrent copyright infringement and helping to resolve nearly 2000 cases
  • We have strong credentials standing behind our arguments and the other side is well aware of this
  • We understand the panic or anxiety you may feel at receiving a copyright infringement lawsuit from VENICE PI LLC over the movie “ONCE UPON A TIME IN VENICE”, and we are experienced in helping Chicago area users make calm, informed decisions throughout this process

Ready to take the first step in resolving the VENICE PI LLC copyright infringement allegations brought against Chicagoland users over the movie, “ONCE UPON A TIME IN VENICE”?

Contact us today.

The Case Numbers for the VENICE PI LLC Copyright Infringement Claims are:
List of VENICE PI LLC Cases Filed by State

District of Colorado:

Venice PI, LLC v. Does

1:17-cv-02021
1:17-cv-02036
1:17-cv-02197
1:17-cv-02273
1:17-cv-02292
1:17-cv-02329
John Doe 1 et al 1:17-cv-01988
John Does 1-6 1:17-cv-01954
Doe 1 et al 1:17-cv-01917
John Does 1-15 1:17-cv-01870
Doe 1 et al 1:17-cv-01861
John Doe 1 et al 1:17-cv-01850
Doe 1 et al 1:17-cv-01787
Doe 1 et al 1:17-cv-01664

District of Hawaii:

Venice PI, LLC v. Does

1:17-cv-00420
1:17-cv-00488
1:17-cv-00335

District of Illinois

Venice PI, LLC v. Does:

1:17-cv-06412
1:17-cv-06414
1:17-cv-06418
1:17-cv-06420
1:17-cv-06422

District of Indiana:

Venice PI, LLC v. Does:

1:17-cv-00379
2:17-cv-00350
Doe 1 et al 1:17-cv-02328
Doe 1 et al 1:17-cv-02274
Doe 1 et al 2:17-cv-00285
Doe 1 et al 2:17-cv-00284

District of New York:

Venice PI, LLC v.

Doe-66.108.113.178 et al 1:17-cv-05594

Doe-24.187.92.79 et al 1:17-cv-04904

Doe-24.44.143.124 et al 1:17-cv-04249

Doe-68.173.101.58 et al 1:17-cv-04076

District of North Carolina:

Venice PI, LLC v.

5:17-cv-00432

7:17-cv-00172

5:17-cv-00439

2:17-cv-00039

Does 1-9 1:17-cv-00219

Does 1-12 1:17-cv-00745

Does 1-10 3:17-cv-00445

Does 1-11 5:17-cv-00128

Does 1-14 5:17-cv-00367

Does 1-10 1:17-cv-00671

Does 1-10 1:17-cv-00676

Does1-11 1:17-cv-00611

Does1-18 1:17-cv-00610

Does 1-10 3:17-cv-00409

Doe 1 et al 5:17-cv-00340

Doe 1 et al 5:17-cv-00339

Doe 1 et al 5:17-cv-00337

Does 1-11 5:17-cv-00334

Does 1-12 5:17-cv-00333

Does 1-10 1:17-cv-00170

Doe 1 et al 4:17-cv-00089

District of Pennsylvania:

Venice PI, LLC v.

John Does 1-11 2:17-cv-03324

John Does 1-7 2:17-cv-03323

John Does 1-8 2:17-cv-03326

John Does 1-14 2:17-cv-03325

John Does 1-10 2:17-cv-03322

District of Texas:

Venice PI, LLC v.

Does 1-13 4:17-cv-02395

Does 1-10 4:17-cv-02285

Does 1-16 4:17-cv-02244

Does 1-16 4:17-cv-02203

District of Virginia:

Venice PI, LLC v.

Does 5:17-cv-00089

Does 5:17-cv-00090

Does 1-15 5:17-cv-00070

District of Washington:

Venice PI, LLC v.

Doe 1 et al 2:17-cv-01403

Doe 1 et al 2:17-cv-01219

Doe 1 et al 2:17-cv-01211

Doe 1 et al 2:17-cv-01160

Doe 1 et al 2:17-cv-01163

Doe 1 et al 2:17-cv-01164

Venice Pi Order 17-cv-06412 Judge Leinenweber
Venice Pi LLC Order 17-cv-06414 Judge Durkin
Venice Pi LLC Order 17-cv-06422 Judge Leinenweber
Venice Pi LLC Order 17-cv-06420 Judge Leinenweber

 

See Also:

Chicago Comcast Users Sued By Venice PI, LLC For Downloading “Once Upon a Time in Venice” – Antonelli Law Defense

Venice PI, LLC is Suing Indiana Internet Users – But Where is the Evidence? Antonelli Law Defense

Share

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Website Apps