LHF Productions Sues Another 408 Alleged “London Has Fallen” Downloaders in Chicago

Share

September, like August, was a busy month for LHF Productions in the Northern District of Illinois. On September 28th LHF Productions  filed an additional 14 copyright infringement lawsuits against 408 individuals who are yet unnamed.

The next step in these lawsuits are that the targeted internet subscribers will receive an LHF Productions subpoena and a letter from Comcast or CenturyLink about the copyright infringement allegations.

Looking for information on a LHF Productions lawsuit in another state? Click on the state you are interested in:

LHF Productions , through its attorney in Illinois attorney Michael Hierl of the law firm Hughes Socol Piers Resnick Dym Ltd filed these lawsuits alleging that accountholders associated with certain IP addresses illegally downloaded the film “London Has Fallen” in violation of the US Copyright Act.

It is expected that most of the newest 408 people to be targeted in this latest round of lawsuits will receive Comcast letters informing them of the copyright infringement claims and an LHF Productions subpoena demanding the ISP turn over their names and addresses.

The next step in these lawsuits are that the targeted internet subscribers will receive an LHF Productions subpoena and a letter from Comcast or CenturyLink about the copyright infringement allegations. It may mention a motion to quash or vacate the subpoena.

If you receive a subpoena, the best thing to do is to talk with an experienced lawyer.

  • Learn about what the notice means.
  • Do you want to quickly and anonymously make this go away by resolving the lawsuit by settling?
  • Or do you want to prepare to fight the lawsuit?
  • Should you file a motion to quash the subpoena?
  • Ask every question that concerns you.

CONTACT US FOR A FREE ATTORNEY CONSULTATION

Antonelli Law is the most experienced BT copyright defense firm in the country, and has represented many copyright infringement defendants in the Northern District of Illinois federal court. Call us at 312-201-8310 to learn your legal options. We will tell you the risks and benefits of each one.

Attorney Jeffrey Antonelli is admitted to  the federal trial bar of the Northern District of Illinois and many others and can appear in federal court anywhere in the country. Antonelli Law has defended more than 1,500 clients accused of BitTorrent copyright litigation since 2011.

Attorneys: Don’t risk malpractice trying to represent a client in a copyright lawsuit where the  loser pays statutory and attorneys fees. We accept attorney referrals and are very experienced in this specialized litigation.

[contact-form-7 id=”10″ title=”Case Contact”]

If you are the account holder for an internet account, your name is linked to an IP address.

If you receive a letter from  Comcast and a subpoena from LHF Productions Inc. to reveal your identity, call Antonelli Law at 312-201-8310 about motions to quash the subpoena and other options.

Attorney Law’s attorneys are admitted to many federal courts from California to New York and in between. Attorney Jeffrey Antonelli is admitted to the District Court of Colorado, the federal trial bar of the Northern District of Illinois, and many others and can appear in federal court anywhere in the country. Antonelli Law has defended more than 1,500 clients accused of BitTorrent copyright litigation since 2011.

RELATED POSTS

I received a Comcast letter and Subpoena – Help!

Judge Allows LHF Productions Defendants to Proceed Anonymously

LHF Productions Inc. Motion for Protective Order Denied

LHF Productions, Inc. to Ask Illinois Judges to Allow Comcast ISP Subpoenas

Illinois Judge Grants Request by LHF Productions Inc Lawsuit to Issue ISP Subpoenas to Reveal Names of People Who Allegedly Downloaded “London Has Fallen” Using BitTorrent

LHF Productions Inc. adds 315 Defendants in Illinois

#LHFProductions #LondonHasFallen

LHF Productions, Inc – Northern District of Illinois

  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-31 1:2016-cv-09305
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-28 1:2016-cv-09307
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-32 1:2016-cv-09308
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-34 1:2016-cv-09309
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-35 1:2016-cv-09310
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-25 1:2016-cv-09312
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-22 1:2016-cv-09313
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-34 1:2016-cv-09315
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-33 1:2016-cv-09316
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-18 1:2016-cv-09318
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-31 1:2016-cv-09320
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-32 1:2016-cv-09323
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-26 1:2016-cv-09324
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-27 1:2016-cv-09325
  • LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-08403
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-23 16-cv-08408
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-08410
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-22 16-cv-08411
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-16 16-cv-08412
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-28 16-cv-08413
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-08415
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-27 16-cv-08416
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-28 16-cv-08417
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-23 16-cv-08419
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-34 16-cv-08422
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-28 16-cv-07673
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 16-cv-07674
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-33 16-cv-07675
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-31 16-cv-07676
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-32 16-cv-07677
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-28 16-cv-07679
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-28 16-cv-07680
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 16-cv-07681
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-23 16-cv-07684
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-22 16-cv-07687
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 16-cv-07690
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-06796
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-06797
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 16-cv-06798
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 16-cv-06799
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-19 16-cv-06800
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-18 16-cv-06801
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-30 16-cv-06802
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-31 16-cv-06803
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-06805
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-06806
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-39 16-cv-06808
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-22 16-cv-06811
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-30 16-cv-04730
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-27 16-cv-04731
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-04732
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-19 16-cv-04733
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-04734
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-23 16-cv-04740
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-04741
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-28 16-cv-04742
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-04743
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 16-cv-04744
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 16-cv-03903
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 16-cv-03904
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 16-cv-03892
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-21 16-cv-03902
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-03896
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 16-cv-03899
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-27 16-cv-03907
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-27 16-cv-03897
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-31 16-cv-03905
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-03887

If you receive a letter from  Comcast and a subpoena from LHF Productions Inc. to reveal your identity, call Antonelli Law at 312-201-8310.

 

LHF Productions Inc Subpoenas Residents Accused of Downloading "London Has Fallen"
LHF Productions Inc Subpoenas Chicago Residents Accused of Downloading “London Has Fallen”
Share

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Website Apps