LHF Productions Inc. adds 315 Defendants in Illinois
This week in Illinois LHF Productions filed 12 new copyright lawsuits against 315 defendants, with each defendant being an unnamed “Doe.” Overall, this brings the total number of people targeted to around 1,500 people nationwide.
LHF Productions has filed lawsuits in Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Virginia, and Washington state.
If you are the account holder for an internet service provider (ISP), your name is linked to an IP address. If you receive an ISP letter informing you a subpoena was received to reveal your identity, click here to learn about motions to quash or call us at 312-201-8310 or use the contact form below.
Attorney Jeffrey Antonelli is admitted to the trial bar of the Northern District of Illinois federal court as well as numerous federal courts around the country. Antonelli Law has represented defendants accused by LHF Productions living in Hawaii, Arizona, and Illinois of using BitTorrent file-sharing software to illegally download the movie “London Has Fallen” and over 1,100 defendants from California to New York in many BitTorrent copyright infringement lawsuits in federal court.
Jeffrey Antonelli has been recognized by national and local media as representing many people accused of BitTorrent file-sharing of copyrighted work, including by Bloomberg BNA.
Want Legal Advice? Free Initial Consultations
Antonelli Law can help you nationwide if you have received an ISP letter informing you a subpoena for your identity was received, or if you are served with a summons or waiver of service. We will give each of your legal options, and the risks and benefits of each.
If you receive an ISP letter informing you a subpoena was received to reveal your identity, click here to learn about motions to quash, call us at 312-201-8310, or use the contact form below. We represent people nationwide.
We understand the shock you may be feeling from receiving a notice of this action, and have the experience to help you deal with this in the best way possible for you. Attorney referrals accepted.
[contact-form-7 id=”10″ title=”Case Contact”]
Northern District Court of Illinois
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-06796
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-06797
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 16-cv-06798
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 16-cv-06799
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-19 16-cv-06800
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-18 16-cv-06801
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-30 16-cv-06802
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-31 16-cv-06803
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-06805
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-06806
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-39 16-cv-06808
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-22 16-cv-06811
District of Arizona
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-27 2:16-cv-01474
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 2:16-cv-01471
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-20 2:16-cv-01469
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-15 2:16-cv-01472
LHF Productions. Inc v. Does 1-29 2:16-cv-01199
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-18 2:16-cv-01200
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-22 2:16-cv-01196
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-12 2:16-cv-01198
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 2:16-cv-01194
District of California
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-01157
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-01158
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-01035
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-01045
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-00999
District of Colorado
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 1 et al 1:16-cv-01048
District of Hawaii
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-16 1:16-cv-00190
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-10 1:16-cv-00191
Northern District of Illinois
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-30 16-cv-04730
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-27 16-cv-04731
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-04732
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-19 16-cv-04733
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-04734
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-23 16-cv-04740
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-04741
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-28 16-cv-04742
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-04743
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 16-cv-04744
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 16-cv-03903
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 16-cv-03904
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 16-cv-03892
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-21 16-cv-03902
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-03896
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 16-cv-03899
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-27 16-cv-03907
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-27 16-cv-03897
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-31 16-cv-03905
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-03887
District of Nevada
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-11 2:16-cv-00924
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-14 2:16-cv-00925
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-30 2:16-cv-00926
District of New York
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1- 19 1:16-cv-02097
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1- 9 1:16-cv-02114
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1- 14 1:16-cv-03162
District of Oregon
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-00745
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-00746
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-00716
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-00717
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-00591
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-00592
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-00594
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 3:16-cv-00595
District of Virginia
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-10 5:16-cv-00030
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 3:16-cv-00283
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-20 3:16-cv-00284
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 3:16-cv-00282
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 5:16-cv-00027
LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-18 3:16-cv-00274
District of Washington
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 1 – 16 2:16-cv-00621
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 1 – 17 2:16-cv-00623
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 1 – 17 2:16-cv-00551
LHF Productions, Inc v. Doe 1 – 10 2:16-cv-00552
Antonelli Law has defended individuals accused of illegal file-sharing in LHF Productions cases and are able to answer your questions about your legal options.