Category: Antonelli Law

Strike 3 Holdings LLC Sues Connecticut Internet Users for “Free” Porn Downloads– ISP Subpoena Defense

Porn movie company Strike 3 Holdings LLC is suing many people in Connecticut and New York for allegedly downloading its movies using file-sharing technology called BitTorrent. On October 3 2017 Strike 3 Holdings LLC filed its first Connecticut district court lawsuit, Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe 5:17-cv-01667. At the time of

UN4 Productions Nationwide Update – ISP Subpoena Defense

Antonelli Law provides legal defense and settlement assistance nationwide to those targeted in UN4 Productions, Inc copyright infringement lawsuits and subpoenas. The lawsuits alleged unauthorized free downloads of the movie “Boyka”. We often write posts on individual cases in each state the movie company is filing lawsuits in (click here). However, in

UPDATE – Why One UN4 Productions Inc Motion to Quash in Chicago Was Doomed – ISP Defense

UPDATE – Antonelli Law’s Prediction Confirmed – Why One UN4 Productions Inc Motion to Quash in Chicago Was Doomed – Avoid Traps & Hire a Lawyer Even if you don’t file a motion to quash in your UN4 Productions case, the copyright infringement  lawsuit based on the “Boyka” movie, this updated article

UPDATE: NY Judge Questions Badhouse Studios LLC ISP Subpoena – ISP Subpoena Defense

On September 18, 2017 Badhouse Studios, LLC filed 13 federal copyright infringement lawsuits against internet users of Spectrum (Time-Warner Cable), Verizon Fios, and Optimum Online in the District of New York federal court, Southern District. The movie company alleges these internet users illegally downloaded the movie “Larceny” using BitTorrent software. We expect

Strike 3 Holdings LLC Sues New Yorkers for “Free” Porn Downloads– ISP Subpoena Defense

Movie company Strike 3 Holdings LLC is suing many people in New York for allegedly downloading its movies using file-sharing technology called BitTorrent. In District of New York case, Strike 3 Holdings alleges a count of copyright infringement for one of its copyrighted movies, but also alleges the Defendant infringed 56 of
Website Apps