September Productions Subpoena to Reveal Texas Comcast Users Accused of Illegal Movie Downloading

Share

September Productions Subpoena to Reveal Texas Comcast Users Accused of Illegal Movie Downloading

September Productions Inc. accuses defendants of copyright infringement by using software and the internet for allegedly downloading the film “Septembers of Shiraz” without paying the appropriate license fee. The movie is about a secular
Jewish family caught in the Islamic revolution in
Iran.

Received a Subpoena from September Productions from your internet company? Read On.

September Productions Inc. is suing many people right now in Texas. Comcast internet subscribers living in  Cypress, Houston, Humble, Katy, Kema, Lake City, Lake Jackson, Pasadena, Pearland, Richmond, Spring, and Sugar Land were sued in the name of their IP address, and  September Productions Inc. subpoenas will soon be showing up in their mailboxes.

There are Numerous September Productions Inc. Lawsuits.

The lawsuit filed on September 29th is September Productions Inc. v Does 1-22, anonymous BitTorrent users participating in file-sharing swarm identified by hash ending in 6AD3, Case 4:16-cv-02920 filed in the Southern District of Texas.

Another lawsuit is September Productions Inc. v Does 1-16, Case 4:16-cv-02784 filed in the Southern District of Texas.

Each lawsuit is filed in federal court and requests permission to find out the real names of internet users associated with IP addresses suspected of being part of the movie downloading. This is done by sending a subpoena to the internet company (ISP). Most people find out they are involved in the lawsuit when they receive a letter from their internet company (ISP) such as Comcast, COX, Comcast, or Verizon informing them of the copyright infringement allegations. A copy of a September Productions Inc. Subpoena will be enclosed.

If you received an September Productions Inc. Subpoena or were served a Summons in a September Productions Inc. lawsuit, call Antonelli Law nationwide at 312-201-8310 or click here to Talk to a Lawyer For Free.  We will explain what a motion to quash the subpoena is about. If you are the account holder for your internet account, your name is linked to an IP address which can be seen and tracked on the internet. Antonelli Law is the most experienced BT copyright defense law firm in the country.

Our local Houston copyright defense counsel is Tristan Robinson. 

Attorney Tristan Robinson works with us to make sure we resolve your September Productions Inc. subpoena and lawsuit in the most efficient, cost-effective manner for you. Paired with the tremendous nationwide experience of Antonelli Law defending BitTorrent copyright infringement lawsuits around the country we look forward to assisting Texans on the wrong side of a September Productions Inc. subpoena and lawsuit. 

The best thing to do is to talk with an experienced lawyer.

  • Learn about what the notice means.
  • Do you want to quickly and anonymously make this go away by resolving the lawsuit by settling?
  • Or do you want to prepare to fight the lawsuit?
  • Should you file a motion to quash the subpoena
  • Ask every question that concerns you.

This is what clients say Antonelli Law is very good at:

  • Reducing your anxiety about the problem
  • Giving clear information to help you decide what to do
  • Responsive and accessible via phone and email
  • Tenacious and effective lawyers in lawsuit litigation

Call us for a free consultation at 312-201-8310 nationwide or use the contact form below. More information can be found below the contact form.

Attorneys: Don’t risk malpractice in a copyright lawsuit where the  loser pays statutory and attorneys fees. We accept attorney referrals and are very experienced in this specialized litigation.

Party Suing or issuing subpoena (click pull down menu) (Plaintiff)

Name of District Court case is in

Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

State (required)

Daytime Phone

Subject

Your Message

Details of the September Productions Inc Case 4:16-cv-02920 filed in the Southern District of Texas.

ISP: Comcast

File name: Septembers.of.Shiraz.2015.720p.WEB-DL.850MB.MkvCage.mkv

Hash file: SHA1: 1225054C1194551ADD68CD2AE4CEF8BC7F716AD3

73.206.17.56       Humble

73.166.12.116     Houston

73.232.42.101     League City

73.232.30.123     Stafford

98.197.148.128  Sugar Land

73.32.156.51       Sugar Land

98.194.208.214  Houston

76.30.58.79         Houston

76.31.51.37         Houston

73.32.193.240    Katy

73.6.87.12             Houston

73.166.149.149   Kemah

98.196.84.85       Katy

73.6.119.205       Pasadena

98.194.96.53       Houston

98.198.222.34    League City

98.196.217.37     Pasadena

73.6.212.101       Pearland

73.32.46.210       Houston

98.198.16.30       Houston

73.166.152.183   Houston

73.206.138.165    Houston

Related Posts

I received a Comcast letter and Subpoena – Help!

Introducing Our Local Counsel for the Southern District of Texas

Malibu Media LLC Enters Texas – All Hat, No Cattle?

Fathers and Daughters Nevada LLC Moves to Name and Serve in Texas

#SeptemberProductions

 

Share

Cell Film Holdings Subpoena for Comcast Users Coming to Texas

Share

Cell Film Holdings Subpoena for Comcast Users Coming to Texas

Cell Film Holdings LLC, the copyright holder for the movie “Cell” starring John Cusak and Samuel Jackson, is suing internet users near Houston for allegedly downloading the film using file-sharing software over the internet in violation of the US Copyright Act.

Received a Cell Film Holdings Subpoena and a Letter from Comcast About Copyright Infringement? Read On

There are many Cell Film Holdings LLC Lawsuits. Each lawsuit is filed in federal court and requests permission to find out the real names of internet users associated with IP addresses suspected of being part of the movie downloading.

This is done by sending a subpoena to the internet company (ISP). Right now, Cell Film Holdings LLC Subpoenas Texans with Comcast Cable internet service. Most people find out they are involved in the lawsuit when they receive a letter from their internet company (ISP) such as Comcast Communications, COX, AT&T, or Verizon informing them of the copyright infringement allegations.

If you receive a subpoena, the best thing to do is to talk with an experienced lawyer.

  • Learn about what the notice means.
  • Do you want to quickly and anonymously make this go away by resolving the lawsuit by settling?
  • Or do you want to prepare to fight the lawsuit?
  • Should you file a motion to quash the subpoena
  • Ask every question that concerns you.

Our Houston local counsel attorney is Tristan C. Robinson.

If you received an Cell Film Holdings LLC Subpoena or were served a Summons in a Cell Film Holdings LLC lawsuit, call us at 312-201-8310 or click here to Talk to a Lawyer For Free.  We will explain what a motion to quash the subpoena is about. If you are the account holder for your internet account, your name is linked to an IP address which can be seen and tracked on the internet.

This is what clients say Antonelli Law is very good at:
  • Reducing your anxiety about the problem
  • Giving clear information to help you decide what to do
  • Responsive and accessible via phone and email
  • Tenacious and effective lawyers in lawsuit litigation

Call us for a free consultation at 312-201-8310 nationwide or use the contact form below.

A copy of the lawsuit Complaint can be found here. These are the IP addresses targeted by Cell Film Holdings LLC  v. Does 1-10 in case number 4:16-cv-02921 and the cities the internet subscribers live in. All are Comcast internet subscribers:

73.6.170.84                       Houston

73.55.222.105                 Houston

73.232.171.142              Richmond

73.206.47.229                 Houston

73.183.229.65                 Houston

73.6.87.12                          Houston

98.200.237.                       Houston

98.196.217.37                 Pasadena

73.6.212.101                    Pearland

73.183.212.173              Houston

73.155.133.164              Humble

98.201.33.225                 Baytown

98.194.166.171              Deer Park

73.32.178.148                 Sugar Land

98.196.114.32                 League City

73.183.250.184              Houston

73.206.17.56                    Humble

73.155.32.130                 Houston

73.136.57.231                 Katy

98.198.192.133              Houston

Party Suing or issuing subpoena (click pull down menu) (Plaintiff)

Name of District Court case is in

Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

State (required)

Daytime Phone

Subject

Your Message

Other Texas Cell Film Holdings Cases:

For case number 16-cv-02544 Cell Film Holdings LLC v Does 1-25, click here for the court Order allowing the Cell Film  Holdings LLC subpoenas

For case number  16-cv-02781 Cell Film Holdings LLC v Does 1-20 click here for a copy of the lawsuit complaint

These are the IP addresses targeted by Cell Film Holdings LLC  in case number and the cities the internet subscribers live in:

  • 73.155.167.181                      La Marque
  • 73.206.234.7                            Humble
  • 73.232.145.99                         Spring
  • 73.232.147.234                      Richmond
  • 73.255.19.118                        Cypress
  • 73.32.158.45                           Houston
  • 73.76.55.49                              Cypress
  • 76.30.117.254                        Houston
  • 76.30.58.79                              Houston
  • 76.31.18.233                           Houston
  • 76.31.188.166                        Baytown
  • 76.31.87.86                              Houston
  • 98.194.217.67                        Houston
  • 98.194.8.160                           Houston
  • 98.197.126.205                     Houston
  • 98.197.158.245                     Lake Jackson
  • 98.199.242.111                     Houston
  • 98.200.137.27                        Pasadena
  • 98.201.246.163                     Houston
  • 73.166.155.38                        Houston

File Name: Cell.2016.720p.WEB-DL.800MB.ShAaNiG.mkv
File Hash: 7137AF3CBA43D0549186D0F1EDFCB503CA2390CF
ISP: Comcast Communications Management, L.L.C.

Antonelli Law is the Most Experienced BY Copyright Defense Law Firm in the Country

If you received an Cell Film Holdings LLC Subpoena or were served a Summons in a Cell Film Holdings LLC lawsuit, call us nationwide at 312-201-8310 or click here to Talk to a Lawyer For Free.

Antonelli Law’s experience with these specialized types of BitTorrent copyright infringement cases with over 1,500 clients nationwide not only makes us very competent, but we are far more efficient than other lawyers who don’t handle a lot of these cases. This means you do not have to pay legal fees for us to learn how to handle these cases and you can trust our professional judgment to help you reach the best decisions for your case. Cell Film Holdings LLC Lawsuits are dangerous for inexperienced lawyers because they involve statutory damages and possible attorney fee awards.

Our attorneys and local counsel are admitted to the district courts wherever Cell Film Holdings LLC lawsuits are filed from coast to coast. And, we are able to represent you in your federal case without being more expensive or more difficult to hire than hiring a local law firm in part because federal courts require attorneys to file their papers electronically, and often conduct hearings by telephone. This makes frequent trips to the courthouse unnecessary. We can also defend you and help protect your anonymity in a Cell Film Holdings LLC lawsuit if circumstances allow.

Some of our attorneys are listed below. We represent clients in Hawaii, California, Utah, Nevada, Colorado, Texas, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin, Louisiana, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Washington DC, and Virginia.

Who Are Our Local Counsel?Mark Del Bianco
Jurisdictions: Maryland, Washington DC
Leslie Farber
Jurisdictions: New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania

Peter Glazer
Jurisdiction: Virginia

Byron L. Ames
Jurisdictions: Nevada & Utah

Tristan C. Robinson
Jurisdiction: Texas

Jeffrey-Antonelli

Jurisdictions: Illinois, Indiana, Colorado, Michigan, Wisconsin, and others through pro hac vice

 

RELATED POSTS

I received a Comcast letter and Subpoena – Help!

Introducing Our Local Counsel for the Southern District of Texas

Cell Film Productions LLC Subpoenas Texans

Got a Cell Film Holdings Subpoena? Ask a Lawyer for Free

Court Allows Subpoenas to Reveal Hawaiian Telecom Downloaders of “Cell” Movie – Cell Film Holdings LLC

Cell Film Productions LLC Subpoenas Ohio Internet Users

Cell Film Productions LLC Subpoenas Maryland Comcast Internet Users

Cell Film Holdings LLC Lawsuits From New York to Hawaii

Got a Cell Film Holdings LLC Subpoena in Virginia? Ask a Lawyer for Free

 

 

Share

10 New Colorado Alleged Downloaders Sued in LHF Productions Lawsuit

Share

More LHF Productions Inc Subpoenas in Colorado – Comcast and CenturyLink Copyright Letters Coming

In July, August, and September we reported court records showing many Colorado residents being sued for allegedly downloading the movie “London has Fallen” without permission. Now, even more Colorado residents have been sued in the name of their IP address and LHF Productions Inc. Subpoenas will soon be showing up in their mailboxes.

Comcast Cable and CenturyLink internet subscribers living  in Arvada, Aspen, Avon, Basalt, Breckenridge, Colorado Springs, Denver, Fort Collins, Littleton, Monument, Parker, Snowmass Village have been sued by LHF Productions Inc. in the following cases:

Colorado district judge Michael E. Hegarty granted LHF Productions, Inc.’s  request to issue subpoenas to internet Service Providers (ISPs) to reveal the identities of certain subscribers who are alleged to have illegally downloaded the movie “London Has Fallen.”Copies of the court Orders can be found here for case 16-cv-02244-wyd-meh and here for case 16-cv-02208-wyd-meh

Received an LHF Productions Subpoena? The best thing to do is to talk with an experienced lawyer.

  • Learn about what the notice means.
  • Do you want to quickly and anonymously make this go away by resolving the lawsuit by settling?
  • Or do you want to prepare to fight the lawsuit?
  • Should you file a motion to quash the subpoena
  • Ask every question that concerns you.

Attorney Jeffrey Antonelli is admitted to the District of Colorado federal bar. Antonelli Law has defended many Colorado residents likewise accused of copyright infringement, and over 1,500 clients nationwide.

If you received an LHF Productions Inc Subpoena or were served a Summons in a LHF Productions Inc . lawsuit, call us at 312-201-8310 or click here to Talk to a Lawyer For Free.  We will explain what a motion to quash the subpoena is about. If you are the account holder for your internet account, your name is linked to an IP address which can be seen and tracked on the internet.

This is what clients say Antonelli Law is very good at:

  • Reducing your anxiety about the problem
  • Giving clear information to help you decide what to do
  • Responsive and accessible via phone and email
  • Tenacious and effective lawyers in lawsuit litigation

Call us for a free consultation at 312-201-8310 nationwide or use the contact form below. Scroll down for more information can be found below the contact form.

 

Party Suing or issuing subpoena (click pull down menu) (Plaintiff)

Name of District Court case is in

Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

State (required)

Daytime Phone

Subject

Your Message

There are many LHF Productions Inc Lawsuits.

Each lawsuit is filed in federal court and requests permission to find out the real names of internet users associated with IP addresses suspected of being part of the movie downloading. This is done by sending a subpoena to the internet company (ISP). Most people find out they are involved in the lawsuit when they receive a letter from their internet company (ISP) such as Comcast, COX, Comcast, or Verizon informing them of the copyright infringement allegations. A copy of a LHF Productions Inc Subpoena is enclosed.

If you are the account holder for an internet service provider (ISP), your name is linked to an IP address. If you receive a Comcast letter informing you a subpoena was received to reveal your identity, click here to learn about motions to quash or call Antonelli Law at 312-201-8310 or use the contact form below. LHF Productions Inc Subpoenas can be scary or inconvenient, but we can help you manage the risk and the hassle. Attorneys: Don’t risk malpractice in a copyright lawsuit where the  loser pays statutory and attorneys fees. We accept attorney referrals and are very experienced in this specialized litigation.

Antonelli Law is the most experienced BT copyright defense firm in the country, and have represented many copyright infringement defendants in Colorado federal court. Call us to learn your legal options. We will tell you the risks and benefits of each one.

Jeffrey Antonelli has been recognized by national and local media as representing many people accused of BitTorrent file-sharing of copyrighted work, including by Bloomberg BNA.

For immediate advice and a free initial consultation about this LHF Productions, Inc. lawsuit call attorney Jeffrey Antonelli at 312-201-8310 or fill out our simple contact page or email us with a request to call you back at a time that is convenient for you. We understand the shock you may be feeling from receiving a notice of this action, and have the experience to help you deal with this in the best way possible for you. Attorney referrals accepted

Case 1:16-cv-02456-WYD-MEH LHF Productions Inc v Does 1-10

ISPs: Comcast Cable and CenturyLink

SHA-1 Hash:
6B30D9F4FB05238053EA9
201DDC079FF27923D59

IP Address                                       City

50.134.235.15                    Longmont

71.205.153.174                Denver

71.196.162.84                   Basalt

98.245.63.201                   Aspen

71.237.115.89                  Denver

76.25.230.228                 Littleton

50.170.186.52                 Longmont

67.164.227.58                 Denver

75.166.173.26                 Denver

174.29.193.164              Aurora

 

Case 1:16-cv-02208-WYD-MEH

ISP: Comcast Cable

SHA-1 Hash:
6B30D9F4FB05238053EA9201DDC079FF27923D59

IP Address                                          City

71.229.215.66 61982                  Littleton

67.164.178.253                               Denver

24.9.121.146                                     Fort Collins

73.34.25.24                                        Arvada

24.8.1.211                                           Aurora

75.71.1.96                                          Avon

73.229.195.105                              Colorado Springs

71.237.118.110                              Denver

73.203.8.51                                      Snowmass Village

73.169.54.130                                Aurora

67.176.120.255                             Littleton

73.14.207.239                                Monument

75.70.179.226                                Aurora

67.174.123.238                             Breckenridge

75.71.155.226                                Parker

75.71.58.38 50745                      Colorado Springs

73.34.13.115 3                               Denver

24.8.95.34 8                                     Denver

Related Posts

LHF Productions Inc Subpoena? Talk to a Lawyer For Free

More LHF Productions Inc Subpoenas in Colorado – Comcast Copyright Letters Coming

LHF Productions Inc. Lawsuits in Minnesota – Subpoenas Expected

LHF Productions Lawsuit Goes After Brooklyn Movie Downloaders

More Virginians Targeted by LHF Productions Inc Lawsuit in Virginia

LHF Productions Subpoenas Approved for North Carolinians for “London Has Fallen” Downloads

More LHF Productions Inc New York Subpoenas Issued

LHF Productions Inc. Lawsuits in Arizona Continue – Subpoenas Expected

LHF Productions Inc. Lawsuits in Arizona Continue – Subpoenas Expected

#LHFProductions #LondonHasFallen

Share

LHF Productions Sues Another 408 Alleged “London Has Fallen” Downloaders in Chicago

Share

September, like August, was a busy month for LHF Productions in the Northern District of Illinois. On September 28th LHF Productions  filed an additional 14 copyright infringement lawsuits against 408 individuals who are yet unnamed.

The next step in these lawsuits are that the targeted internet subscribers will receive an LHF Productions subpoena and a letter from Comcast or CenturyLink about the copyright infringement allegations.

Looking for information on a LHF Productions lawsuit in another state? Click on the state you are interested in:

LHF Productions , through its attorney in Illinois attorney Michael Hierl of the law firm Hughes Socol Piers Resnick Dym Ltd filed these lawsuits alleging that accountholders associated with certain IP addresses illegally downloaded the film “London Has Fallen” in violation of the US Copyright Act.

It is expected that most of the newest 408 people to be targeted in this latest round of lawsuits will receive Comcast letters informing them of the copyright infringement claims and an LHF Productions subpoena demanding the ISP turn over their names and addresses.

The next step in these lawsuits are that the targeted internet subscribers will receive an LHF Productions subpoena and a letter from Comcast or CenturyLink about the copyright infringement allegations. It may mention a motion to quash or vacate the subpoena.

If you receive a subpoena, the best thing to do is to talk with an experienced lawyer.

  • Learn about what the notice means.
  • Do you want to quickly and anonymously make this go away by resolving the lawsuit by settling?
  • Or do you want to prepare to fight the lawsuit?
  • Should you file a motion to quash the subpoena?
  • Ask every question that concerns you.

CONTACT US FOR A FREE ATTORNEY CONSULTATION

Antonelli Law is the most experienced BT copyright defense firm in the country, and has represented many copyright infringement defendants in the Northern District of Illinois federal court. Call us at 312-201-8310 to learn your legal options. We will tell you the risks and benefits of each one.

Attorney Jeffrey Antonelli is admitted to  the federal trial bar of the Northern District of Illinois and many others and can appear in federal court anywhere in the country. Antonelli Law has defended more than 1,500 clients accused of BitTorrent copyright litigation since 2011.

Attorneys: Don’t risk malpractice trying to represent a client in a copyright lawsuit where the  loser pays statutory and attorneys fees. We accept attorney referrals and are very experienced in this specialized litigation.

Party Suing or issuing subpoena (click pull down menu) (Plaintiff)

Name of District Court case is in

Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

State (required)

Daytime Phone

Subject

Your Message

If you are the account holder for an internet account, your name is linked to an IP address.

If you receive a letter from  Comcast and a subpoena from LHF Productions Inc. to reveal your identity, call Antonelli Law at 312-201-8310 about motions to quash the subpoena and other options.

Attorney Law’s attorneys are admitted to many federal courts from California to New York and in between. Attorney Jeffrey Antonelli is admitted to the District Court of Colorado, the federal trial bar of the Northern District of Illinois, and many others and can appear in federal court anywhere in the country. Antonelli Law has defended more than 1,500 clients accused of BitTorrent copyright litigation since 2011.

RELATED POSTS

I received a Comcast letter and Subpoena – Help!

Judge Allows LHF Productions Defendants to Proceed Anonymously

LHF Productions Inc. Motion for Protective Order Denied

LHF Productions, Inc. to Ask Illinois Judges to Allow Comcast ISP Subpoenas

Illinois Judge Grants Request by LHF Productions Inc Lawsuit to Issue ISP Subpoenas to Reveal Names of People Who Allegedly Downloaded “London Has Fallen” Using BitTorrent

LHF Productions Inc. adds 315 Defendants in Illinois

#LHFProductions #LondonHasFallen

LHF Productions, Inc – Northern District of Illinois

  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-31 1:2016-cv-09305
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-28 1:2016-cv-09307
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-32 1:2016-cv-09308
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-34 1:2016-cv-09309
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-35 1:2016-cv-09310
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-25 1:2016-cv-09312
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-22 1:2016-cv-09313
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-34 1:2016-cv-09315
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-33 1:2016-cv-09316
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-18 1:2016-cv-09318
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-31 1:2016-cv-09320
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-32 1:2016-cv-09323
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-26 1:2016-cv-09324
  • LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC. v Does 1-27 1:2016-cv-09325
  • LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-08403
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-23 16-cv-08408
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-08410
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-22 16-cv-08411
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-16 16-cv-08412
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-28 16-cv-08413
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-08415
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-27 16-cv-08416
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-28 16-cv-08417
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-23 16-cv-08419
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-34 16-cv-08422
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-28 16-cv-07673
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 16-cv-07674
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-33 16-cv-07675
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-31 16-cv-07676
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-32 16-cv-07677
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-28 16-cv-07679
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-28 16-cv-07680
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 16-cv-07681
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-23 16-cv-07684
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-22 16-cv-07687
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 16-cv-07690
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-06796
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-06797
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 16-cv-06798
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 16-cv-06799
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-19 16-cv-06800
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-18 16-cv-06801
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-30 16-cv-06802
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-31 16-cv-06803
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-06805
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-06806
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-39 16-cv-06808
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-22 16-cv-06811
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-30 16-cv-04730
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-27 16-cv-04731
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-04732
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-19 16-cv-04733
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-04734
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-23 16-cv-04740
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-04741
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-28 16-cv-04742
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-29 16-cv-04743
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 16-cv-04744
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 16-cv-03903
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-24 16-cv-03904
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 16-cv-03892
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-21 16-cv-03902
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-03896
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-26 16-cv-03899
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-27 16-cv-03907
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-27 16-cv-03897
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-31 16-cv-03905
    LHF Productions, Inc v. Does 1-25 16-cv-03887

If you receive a letter from  Comcast and a subpoena from LHF Productions Inc. to reveal your identity, call Antonelli Law at 312-201-8310.

 

LHF Productions Inc Subpoenas Residents Accused of Downloading "London Has Fallen"
LHF Productions Inc Subpoenas Chicago Residents Accused of Downloading “London Has Fallen”
Share

LHF Productions Files Second Utah Copyright Lawsuit Against Comcast and CenturyLink Subscribers

Share

LHF Productions, Inc.  the copyright holder for the movie “London Has Fallen” continues its national copyright enforcement campaign by filing lawsuits in Utah.  LHF Productions, Inc. is suing internet users in Utah and other jurisdictions for allegedly downloading the film using file-sharing software over the internet in violation of the US Copyright Act

On August 5th, we reported that LHF Productions filed a lawsuit against Comcast Cable internet subscribers in Salt Lake City. That case is LHF Productions Inc. v. Does 1-23, 2:2016-cv-00860. Click here for a copy of the lawsuit complaint).

On September 27th, LHF Productions, Inc filed its second copyright infringement complaint against Comcast and CenturyLink subscribers in case number 2:16-cv-01007-BCW LHF Productions Inc. v. Does 1-30 (click here for a copy of the Complaint).

The next step in these lawsuits are Utah internet subscribers receiving an LHF Productions subpoena and a letter from Comcast or CenturyLink about the copyright infringement allegations.

If you receive a subpoena, the best thing to do is to talk with an experienced lawyer.

  • Learn about what the notice means.
  • Do you want to quickly and anonymously make this go away by resolving the lawsuit by settling?
  • Or do you want to prepare to fight the lawsuit?
  • Should you file a motion to quash the subpoena
  • Ask every question that concerns you.

Our Utah local counsel is Byron L. Ames. Byron is admitted to practice in the United States District Courts of the District of Nevada, Central District of Utah, Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, and the U.S. Supreme Court.

Antonelli Law has represented over 1,500 clients who were in your shoes, finding themselves shocked to be involved in a federal copyright infringement movie file-sharing case.

Call us at 312-201-8310 or click here to Talk to a Lawyer For Free.  We will explain what the motion to quash the subpoena is about. Read more information about the LHF Productions Utah subpoenas below or fill out our contact form for a free lawyer consultation nationwide.

Party Suing or issuing subpoena (click pull down menu) (Plaintiff)

Name of District Court case is in

Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

State (required)

Daytime Phone

Subject

Your Message

Like the first lawsuit, this second lawsuit goes after unnamed defendants in Salt Lake City but also ads far more individuals outside of Salt Lake City including Bountiful, Herryman, Layton, Kaysville, Layton , Lehi, North Salt Lake City, Ogden, Provo, Roy, Sandy City, and South Jordan.

The complaint alleges that the defendants used a BitTorrent or similar file-sharing program to obtain the movie “London Has Fallen” using SHA-1 Hash ID file: F57D4098BC49996D12F0D89858A1284E1FE1DDC7.

This is what clients say Antonelli Law is very good at:
  • Reducing your anxiety about the problem
  • Giving clear information to help you decide what to do
  • Responsive and accessible via phone and email
  • Tenacious and effective lawyers in lawsuit litigation

Call us for a free consultation at 312-201-8310 nationwide.

More About Our Utah Local Counsel

Byron Ames is a Managing Partner in his law firm Ames & Ames with offices in Kamas, Utah and Las Vegas, Nevada.  He is responsible for management of the Firm’s Utah  and Nevada offices. His practice includes all phases of general litigation and transactional work, with an emphasis in the transportation, hospitality and construction industries.

CONTACT US FOR A FREE ATTORNEY CONSULTATION (Click Here)

If you are the account holder for an internet account, your name is linked to an IP address. If you receive a letter from your internet service provider (ISP) such as Comcast, Cox Communications, or Century Link, which informs you a subpoena was received to reveal your identity, click here to learn about motions to quash or call Antonelli Law at 312-201-8310 or use the contact form below.

Attorney Law’s attorneys are admitted to many federal courts from California to New York and in between. Attorney Jeffrey Antonelli is admitted to the District Court of Colorado, the federal trial bar of the Northern District of Illinois, and many others and can appear in federal court anywhere in the country. Antonelli Law has defended more than 1,500 clients accused of BitTorrent copyright litigation since 2011.

Attorneys: Don’t risk malpractice trying to represent a client in a copyright lawsuit where the  loser pays statutory and attorneys fees. We accept attorney referrals and are very experienced in this specialized litigation.

More About BitTorrent Copyright Lawsuits in General

Click here for more information on the LHF Productions, Inc lawsuits. You may find it helpful to read the non-attorney blogs about these type of lawsuits by Fight Copyright Trolls and Die Troll Die. In particular, while not written by a lawyer, the post “Copyright Troll Poker” – OR How To Survive This Troll “No-Limit” Game may be very helpful to understand the psychology and monetary and legal risks of being a defendant.

RELATED POSTS

I received a Comcast letter and Subpoena – Help!

Introducing Our Local Counsel for Nevada & Utah BitTorrent Copyright Defense

More LHF Productions Inc Subpoenas in Colorado – Comcast Copyright Letters Coming

LHF Productions Subpoenas Arizona COX Communications Users

LHF Productions Lawsuits in Utah, Maryland, New York

 

 

Share