Dallas Buyers Club LLC hits 4000 Defendants

Share

Dallas Buyers Club LLC, the copyright holder suing thousands across the country for allegedly downloading the movie Dallas Buyers Club illegally using peer-to-peer technology has now reached over 4,000 defendants targeted in hundreds of lawsuits nationwide, just four months after reaching the 3,000 mark in August 2014.

On Friday, Dallas Buyers Club LLC filed 5 new copyright lawsuits against an 68 additional “John Doe” defendants in the Eastern District of Michigan:

4:14-cv-14799 Dallas Buyers Club v. Does 1-8
2:14-cv-14803 Dallas Buyers Club v. Does 1-11
2:14-cv-14804 Dallas Buyers Club v. Does 1-20
2:14-cv-14805 Dallas Buyers Club v. Does 1-20
2:14-cv-14806 Dallas Buyers Club v. Does 1-19

Like each previous federal lawsuit filed by Dallas Buyers Club LLC, the company alleges these as-yet anonymous Doe defendants illegally downloaded the movie Dallas Buyers Club using BitTorrent or similar peer-to-peer file-sharing programs without paying the appropriate license fee.

If you receive a letter from your ISP notifying you it received a subpoena to reveal your identity relating to a Dallas Buyers Club LLC lawsuit, read our prior post Dallas Buyers Club lawsuits – How to Respond to an ISP Letter.

If you are a parent make sure your children are not downloading the Dallas Buyers Club movie using BitTorrent or similar software, and the same goes if you have roommates: make sure your roommates are not doing this. Being a target of a federal lawsuit like this over a movie download is not fun, not fair, and is avoidable.  If you have never heard of BitTorrent software and are confused, call Antonelli Law at the telephone number below and visit Fightcopyrighttrolls.com and DieTrollDie.com

Antonelli Law helps clients nationwide defending against federal BitTorrent copyright infringement claims, including claims by the Dallas Buyers Club LLC lawsuits.  Attorney Jeffrey Antonelli is admitted to all federal courts of Indiana, Wisconsin, Michigan, Colorado, the Northern and Central Districts of Illinois,  and can represent clients in any federal court anywhere. Antonelli Law also has local counsel in Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Maryland, Washington DC, Virginia, and Florida.

Antonelli Law has helped hundreds of clients specifically faced with  being targeted in a Dallas Buyers Club LLC lawsuit and nearly a thousand clients targeted in BitTorrent copyright and satellite piracy lawsuits. For additional information visit our web page on Dallas Buyers Club LLC lawsuits.

Call Antonelli Law at 312-201-8310 and speak with one of our attorneys experienced with BitTorrent copyright litigation, or use the contact form below to request a convenient time to have a free, in-depth initial consultation with an experienced BitTorrent copyright defense attorney about each of your options.

Party Suing or issuing subpoena (click pull down menu) (Plaintiff)

Name of District Court case is in

Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

State (required)

Daytime Phone

Subject

Your Message

Other recently filed Dallas Buyers Club LLC lawsuits are as follows:

Washington

2:14-cv-01926            Dallas Buyers Club v. Does 1-35

Florida

6:14-cv-02029 Dallas Buyers Club v. Doe
2:14-cv-00709 Dallas Buyers Club v. Doe

Share

Meet Antonelli Law’s Florida Local Counsel

Share

With more than 50 new BitTorrent copyright cases filed by Good Man Productions and Poplar Oaks recently, most of them in Florida, we thought this would be a good time to introduce our Florida local counsel Jonathan Rupprechet

We connected with Jonathan earlier this year due to our mutual interest in commercial drones, also known as Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS). Jonathan has an upcoming book on UAS being published by the American Bar Association, and obtained his Bachelor of Science in Professional Aeronautics from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Magna Cum Laude, and a Juris Doctor from Florida International University School of Law. He is a commercial pilot for single and multi-engine aircraft ratings and also a flight instructor for airplanes and instruments.

Jonathan RupprechtWhile in law school Jonathan gained valuable courtroom experience interning for Judge Beatrice Butchko of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida as well as Judge Jorge Cueto at the downtown Miami courthouse. He also gained valuable criminal law experience prosecuting cases at the State Attorney’s office in West Palm Beach as a certified legal intern.

What struck me about Jonathan aside from our mutual interest in drones was his work ethic and character for honesty. Sounding like someone like myself, I knew I wanted to work with him.  And, since Jonathan also happens to be located in the southern Florida epicenter of BitTorrent copyright litigation, we felt adding Jonathan to our already strong team of BitTorrent copyright defense counsel would make for a good fit.

If you need Florida copyright defense in the Southern and Middle Districts of Florida, call Antonelli Law at 312-201-8310 or use the contact form below.

Party Suing or issuing subpoena (click pull down menu) (Plaintiff)

Name of District Court case is in

Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

State (required)

Daytime Phone

Subject

Your Message

Florida cases filed by Good Man Productions and Poplar Oaks:

Good Man Productions, Inc.

  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 8:14-cv-03000
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 8:14-cv-03001
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 8:14-cv-03002
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 8:14-cv-03004
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 8:14-cv-03005
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 8:14-cv-03007
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 8:14-cv-03008
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 8:14-cv-03003
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1:14-cv-24559
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 0:14-cv-62724
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1:14-cv-24564
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 9:14-cv-81504
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 0:14-cv-62726
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 0:14-cv-62727
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 9:14-cv-81505
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 9:14-cv-81506
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 0:14-cv-62728
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 0:14-cv-62729
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 0:14-cv-62730
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 0:14-cv-62732
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 9:14-cv-81507
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1:14-cv-24567
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1:14-cv-24568
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1:14-cv-24569
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 0:14-cv-62734
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 9:14-cv-81508
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 0:14-cv-62735
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 2:14-cv-00690
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 2:14-cv-00689
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 2:14-cv-00688
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 2:14-cv-00687
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 8:14-cv-02993
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 8:14-cv-02994
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 8:14-cv-02995
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 8:14-cv-02997
  • Good Man Productions, Inc. v. Doe 8:14-cv-02998

Poplar Oaks, Inc.

  • Poplar Oaks, Inc. v. Doe 1:14-cv-24563
  • Poplar Oaks, Inc. v. Doe 1:14-cv-24566
  • Poplar Oaks, Inc. v. Doe 0:14-cv-62733
  • Poplar Oaks, Inc. v. Doe 9:14-cv-81509
  • Poplar Oaks, Inc. v. Doe 8:14-cv-02999
  • Poplar Oaks, Inc. v. Doe 8:14-cv-03006
  • Poplar Oaks, Inc. v. Doe 2:14-cv-00692
  • Poplar Oaks, Inc. v. Doe 2:14-cv-00691
  • Poplar Oaks, Inc. V. Doe 8:14-cv-02996

 

Share